Calculating Distance Traveled (Arc Length)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the distance traveled along a curve defined by the equation y = 156 - (x - 40)²/60, specifically between the points x = 0 and x = 85. The subject area includes concepts from calculus, particularly arc length and integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the arc length formula and its application, questioning the correctness of their substitutions and calculations. Some suggest using trigonometric substitutions while others propose numerical approximations to estimate the distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing different interpretations and calculations of the arc length. Some have offered alternative methods and approximations, while others express uncertainty about their results and the use of hyperbolic functions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of imposed homework constraints, such as not using certain functions that have not yet been covered in class. Participants also express confusion regarding specific substitutions and limits in their calculations.

colonelone
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given y = 156 - (x - 40)2/60. x = 0 and x = 85 Find distance traveled

Homework Equations



Arc Length S = integral of square root of ( y' )2

The Attempt at a Solution



Doing this I get the trig sub tan(t) = (x - 40)/ 30 (Told by teacher to use this instead of -(x - 40)/30 )
so x = 30tan(t) + 40
and dx = 30sec2(t)

So then under the radical I get 1 + ( - (tan (t) )2
So is this equal to the square root of sec2(t)?

Assuming it is, I get the integral of sec2(t) times 30sec2(t) or sec3(t)

I know how to do this (I think) but I'm really not sure (I can't use what's written in the back of my book).

Doing the work I get:

S(x) = 15sec(t)tan(t) + (1/2) ln[ (sec(t) + tan(t) ]
Substitution x back in for t gives

tan(t) = (x-40)/30
and
sec(t) = square root [ 1 + ( ( -x + 40)/(30) )2

But evaluating this from 0 to 85 gives me an arc length of ~ 75.05, which I know can't be right, but I can't figure out where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it S= integral (sqrt( 1+ (y')^2)) ?

y' = (40-x)/30
(y')^2 = ((40-x)^2)/900
integral sqrt(1+((40-x)^2)/900), x=0..85 ~ 108.296

As a matter of fact you could've estimated this distance by taking mid-way point (in this case its an inflection point (x-40)/30 = 0 -> x=40

at x=40, y=156
at x=0, y=129.3
at x=85, y=122.25

As you can see you can draw 2 lines from x=0 to x=40, and from x=40 to x=85, then add up the distances to get your approximate arc length:

sqrt((0-40)^2+(156-129.3)^2) + sqrt((85-40)^2 + (156-122.25)^2) ~ 104.34
 
Last edited:
cronxeh said:
Isn't it S= integral (sqrt( 1+ (y')^2)) ?

y' = (40-x)/30
(y')^2 = ((40-x)^2)/900
integral sqrt(1+((40-x)^2)/900), x=0..85 ~ 108.296

As a matter of fact you could've estimated this distance by taking mid-way point (in this case its an inflection point (x-40)/30 = 0 -> x=40

at x=40, y=156
at x=0, y=129.3
at x=85, y=122.25

As you can see you can draw 2 lines from x=0 to x=40, and from x=40 to x=85, then add up the distances to get your approximate arc length:

sqrt((0-40)^2+(156-129.3)^2) + sqrt((85-40)^2 + (156-122.25)^2) ~ 104.34

What equation did you use to evaluate s(x)?

Once I redid/rechecked everything I got

s(x) = 15 [ sqrt [ 1 + ( ( -x + 40)/(30 ) )2 ] * ( ( x - 40 ) / (30) ) + ln [ sqrt [ 1 + ( ( -x + 40)/(30 ) )2 + ( ( x - 40 ) / (30) ) ]
 
[tex]S = \int^{85}_{0} \sqrt{1+\frac{(40-x)^{2}}{900}} dx[/tex]
 
cronxeh said:
[tex]S = \int^{85}_{0} \sqrt{1+\frac{(40-x)^{2}}{900}} dx[/tex]

I mean after all the trig sub, the final equation that you substitute 85 and 0 into.
 
colonelone said:
I mean after all the trig sub, the final equation that you substitute 85 and 0 into.

1/60 sqrt((x-40)^2+900) (x-40)+15 sinh^(-1)((x-40)/30)
 
cronxeh said:
1/60 sqrt((x-40)^2+900) (x-40)+15 sinh^(-1)((x-40)/30)

We haven't learned about hyperbolic functions yet. Is there a way to do it without using sinh, i.e. by using trig sub and integration by parts.
 
colonelone said:
We haven't learned about hyperbolic functions yet. Is there a way to do it without using sinh, i.e. by using trig sub and integration by parts.

Sure, its just what you did but with the correct limits, which I think you should double check

Let u=40-x, du=-dx, now do the limits here

integral -sqrt(1+(u^2)/900) du

then substitute u=30*tan(s), du=30*sec^2(s)ds

= integral -sqrt(tan^2(s)+1) =
where s=arcan(u/30)

integral -30*sec^3(s)ds =
-15*tan(s)sec(s) - 15*integral(sec(s)ds)
= -15tan(s)sec(s) - 15*ln(tan(s)+sec(s))
sub back s=arctan(u/30) and u=40-x:

1/60*(x-40)*sqrt(x^2-80*x+2500) - 15*ln(1/30*(sqrt(x^2-80*x+2500)-x+40))
=58.4839-(-49.8125) = 108.2964
 
cronxeh said:
Sure, its just what you did but with the correct limits, which I think you should double check

Let u=40-x, du=-dx, now do the limits here

integral -sqrt(1+(u^2)/900) du

then substitute u=30*tan(s), du=30*sec^2(s)ds

= integral -sqrt(tan^2(s)+1) =
where s=arcan(u/30)

integral -30*sec^3(s)ds =
-15*tan(s)sec(s) - 15*integral(sec(s)ds)
= -15tan(s)sec(s) - 15*ln(tan(s)+sec(s))
sub back s=arctan(u/30) and u=40-x:

1/60*(x-40)*sqrt(x^2-80*x+2500) - 15*ln(1/30*(sqrt(x^2-80*x+2500)-x+40))
=58.4839-(-49.8125) = 108.2964

For some reason when I plug in the numbers I get an arc length of 118.693625.

Also, where did the 1/60 and 1/30 come from? It seems like you were plugging in ( 40 - x) / 900 for tan(s) instead of ( 40 - x ) /30
 
  • #10
colonelone said:
For some reason when I plug in the numbers I get an arc length of 118.693625.

Also, where did the 1/60 and 1/30 come from? It seems like you were plugging in ( 40 - x) / 900 for tan(s) instead of ( 40 - x ) /30

= -15tan(s)sec(s) - 15*ln(tan(s)+sec(s))
sub back s=arctan(u/30) and u=40-x:

If you agree with that line, then watch the magic:

tan(arctan(x)) = x
cos(arctan(x)) = 1/sqrt(x^2+1)
sec(arctan(x)) = sqrt(x^2+1)
s=arctan((40-x)/30)

-15tan(s)sec(s) - 15*ln(tan(s)+sec(s)) =
-15*ln(tan(s) + 1/cos(s)) - (15*tan(s))/cos(s) =
-15*((40-x)/30)*sqrt(((40-x)/30)^2+1) - 15*ln(((40-x)/30)+sqrt(((40-x)/30)^2+1)) =
(x/2 - 20)*((x/30 - 4/3)^2 + 1)^(1/2) - 15*ln(((x/30 - 4/3)^2 + 1)^(1/2) - x/30 + 4/3)
Plug in your limits x=85, x=0:

58.4839 - (-49.8125) = 108.2964

If you are not a believer in the answer, consider that we forget calculus for a second and just approximate it:

Given y = 156-(x-40)^2/60, let's do 10 intervals from x=0 to x=85:
distance traveled is then ( in MATLAB ):
Code:
x=0:85
d=0;
for i=1:85
d=d+sqrt(((156-(x(i)-40)^2/60) - (156-(x(i+1)-40)^2/60))^2 + (x(i)-x(i+1))^2);
end
d
d =

108.2942

If you want me to go more accurate,

Code:
x=0:0.1:85
d=0;
for i=1:850
d=d+sqrt(((156-(x(i)-40)^2/60) - (156-(x(i+1)-40)^2/60))^2 + (x(i)-x(i+1))^2);
end
d
d =

108.2964
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K