Invariance of length of curve under Euclidean Motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The length of a curve γ in ℝn is invariant under Euclidean motions, as demonstrated by the equation L[Aγ] = L[γ] for the transformation Ax = Rx + a, where R is the rotation matrix and a is a translation vector. The arc-length formula, s(t) = ∫γ'(t)dt from t0 to t, confirms that the arc length remains unchanged after applying the transformation. The translation component 'a' does not affect the arc length, validating that L(γ) = L(Rγ). This conclusion is essential for understanding the properties of curves under Euclidean transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean transformations, including rotation and translation.
  • Familiarity with arc-length calculations and the arc-length formula.
  • Basic knowledge of parameterization of curves in ℝn.
  • Proficiency in matrix operations, specifically with rotation matrices.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of Euclidean transformations in higher dimensions.
  • Study the derivation and applications of the arc-length formula in various contexts.
  • Investigate the implications of curve parameterization on arc length calculations.
  • Learn about the relationship between distance preservation and transformations in metric spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying geometry or calculus, particularly those interested in the properties of curves and transformations in Euclidean spaces.

MxwllsPersuasns
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the length of a curve γ in ℝn is invariant under euclidean motions. I.e., show that L[Aγ] = L[γ] for Ax = Rx + a

Homework Equations


The length of a curve is given by the arc-length formula: s(t) = ∫γ'(t)dt from t0 to t

The Attempt at a Solution


I would imagine I would proceed by first taking the arc length of the curve, γ. I'm not sure if I should do this as general and abstractly as possible or if I should give a specific example (i.e., parameterize γ by the parameter (t) perhaps by something like γ(t) = acos(t)i + bsin(t)j -- an ellipse) and then carry out the arc length of that.

My next step would then be applying the euclidean motion to γ, again, if I'm supposed to do this in the abstract then I'm not exactly sure what I should do. If I'm doing a specific example then I would apply A(γ) = R(γ) + a where I believe R is the n-dimensional (in my case n=2) rotation matrix and 'a' is a translation. Now I would multiply the matrix for the curve γ (a 1x2 matrix) with the rotation matrix (a 2x2 matrix) to then get a new curve (Aγ) then I would take the arc length and see that the arc length formula involves γ' and thus the translation constant 'a' wouldn't contribute to the arc length. Then I guess I'd just hope that L(γ) = L(Rγ).

Can anyone tell me if I have the right idea and also whether they think I should do this problem as generally as possible (and then hopefully guide me on the right path on how to do that) or if doing a specific example like γ ∈ ℝ2 would suffice? Thanks so much in advance guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what level of detail is expected of you. A Euclidean transformation preserves distances between points. Arc length can be defined as a limit of a sequence of functions, each of which is a function of distances between pairs of points. So after a Euclidean transformation, these distances are not changed. So you taking a limit of the same sequence of functions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K