Calculating E Field of Dipoles at Distance r: Griffiths 4.5 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ghost117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipoles Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field of two dipoles, p1 and p2, at a distance r, as outlined in Griffiths' Electrodynamics (4th edition, problem 4.5). The equation used is Edip(r,θ) = p/(4πε0r³) * (2cosθr + sinθθ). The participants clarify the values of the angle θ, with θ = π/2 for the field of p1 at p2 and θ = π for the field of p2 at p1, emphasizing the importance of understanding spherical coordinates in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their properties
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' Electrodynamics, specifically chapter 3
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinate systems
  • Proficiency in applying the formula for electric fields of dipoles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Griffiths' Electrodynamics, focusing on the derivation of electric fields from dipoles
  • Learn about spherical coordinates and their application in physics problems
  • Practice calculating electric fields for multiple dipoles using the formula Edip(r,θ)
  • Explore vector calculus techniques relevant to electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying electrodynamics, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields generated by dipoles.

Ghost117
Messages
50
Reaction score
3
This is part of a question from Griffiths 4.5 (electrodynamics, 4th edition)

Homework Statement



p1 and p2 are (perfect) dipoles a distance r apart (Their alignment is such that p1 is perpendicular to the line separating them (pointing upwards) and p2 is parallel to the line separating them (pointing away from p1).)

What is Field of p1 at p2, and the Field of p2 at p1?

Homework Equations



Edip(r,θ) = p/(4πε0r3) * (2cosθr + sinθθ)

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually have the official solution for this, but I don't understand it... The theta value in the solution uses theta = π/2 for the field of p1 at p2, but a value of theta = π, for the equation for p2 at p1.. And I don't see where either of these theta values are coming from (my spherical coordinates are very weak, and I suspect that's the real problem here.)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note how θ is defined in the diagram (given back in chapter 3). See attached figure.
Imagine that the dipole shown is p1. Where would p2 be located in this figure? What would be the value of θ at the location of p2?
 

Attachments

  • dipole coordinates.png
    dipole coordinates.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 483
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ghost117
TSny said:
Note how θ is defined in the diagram (given back in chapter 3). See attached figure.
Imagine that the dipole shown is p1. Where would p2 be located in this figure? What would be the value of θ at the location of p2?

Yes that's the diagram I'm trying to use, and for E1, I can see why theta = pi/2 (since p2 is on the y-axis in that diagram, pointing away.) But I don't understand why theta = pi when calculating E2 (field of p2 at p1)... If I set p2 as my zero and count to p1 (clockwise) I get 3pi/2... not pi... I just don't see how I can get pi at all for any angle between these two dipoles...
 
When you want to calculate the field of ##\mathbf{p}_2## at ##\mathbf{p}_1##, you have to use a new coordinate system in which the z axis is parallel to ##\mathbf{p}_2## and its positive direction points in the same direction as ##\mathbf{p}_2## does.
Ghost117 said:
If I set p2 as my zero and count to p1 (clockwise) I get 3pi/2
Polar angle only runs from 0 to ##\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ghost117
blue_leaf77 said:
When you want to calculate the field of ##\mathbf{p}_2## at ##\mathbf{p}_1##, you have to use a new coordinate system in which the z axis is parallel to ##\mathbf{p}_2## and its positive direction points in the same direction as ##\mathbf{p}_2## does.

Polar angle only runs from 0 to ##\pi##.

Thank you, I suspected it was going to come down to a basic problem with my understanding of the spherical coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K