Understanding the Coordinate-Free Electric Field of a Dipole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field of a pure dipole can be expressed in a coordinate-free form as \(E_{dip}(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{1}{r^3}[3(\vec p\cdot \hat r)\hat r-\vec p]\). This formulation emphasizes that the dipole moment \(\vec p\) and the unit vector \(\hat r\) are sufficient to describe the electric field without reliance on a specific coordinate system. The discussion clarifies that while the expression involves \(\hat r\) and \(\hat \theta\), it remains coordinate-free as it does not depend on a defined coordinate system, thus allowing for a more general application of the dipole's electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipole moments
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the electric field from dipole moments in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics"
  • Explore the implications of coordinate-free representations in physics
  • Learn about the role of unit vectors in vector fields
  • Investigate the relationship between dipole orientation and electric field direction
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to explain the concept of electric fields in a coordinate-free context.

raddian
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I am "continuing this thread" in hopes of asking questions that deal with the meaning of the question. https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...dipole-moment-in-coordinate-free-form.359973/
1. Homework Statement

Show that the electric field of a "pure" dipole can be written in the coordinate-free form
$$E_{dip}(r)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{1}{r^3}[3(\vec p\cdot \hat r)\hat r-\vec p].$$

Homework Equations


$$E_{dip}(r)=\frac{p}{4\pi\epsilon_0r^3}(2\cos \hat r+\sin\theta \hat \theta)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to understand what "coordinate free" means. If the answer is in terms of r hat and theta hat, doesn't that contradict "coordinate free"? AND i would get $$ p = pcos(\theta) \hat r - psin(\theta) \hat \theta $$. Why doesn't p depend on PHI? If it's coordinate free why are we restricting our coordinates to r and theta??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Coordinate free" means you don't need to define the coordinate system to write your equation. ##\hat{r}## is a unit vector from the center of the dipole to the observation point, so given the orientation of ##\mathbf{p}## in space, the relative direction of ##\hat{r}## with respect to ##\mathbf{p}## will automatically follow.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K