Torque on Dipole Griffith EM 4.5 p. 165

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Torque
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Griffith's E&M problem 4.5, which involves calculating the torque on two dipoles, p1 and p2, positioned a distance r apart. The participants are examining the electric field generated by one dipole on the other and the resulting torque on each dipole.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the electric field equations and the torque calculations for dipoles. They are questioning the correctness of the torque direction and the inclusion of certain terms in the equations. There is also an exploration of the intuitive understanding of the electric field behavior at a distance from a dipole.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and clarifying points about the equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the inclusion of vector components and signs in the torque calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the final results.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem as presented in Griffith's textbook, and there are indications of confusion regarding the orientation of the dipoles and the resulting electric fields. The assumptions about the dipole arrangement and the distances involved are also being examined.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
Griffith's E&M problem 4.5 page 165

In the figure p1 and p2 are perfect dipoles a disantce r apart. What is the torque on p1 due to p2.? Wjat is the torque on p2 due to p1?
the second part is done in post #4
p1 is located on the right pointing upward
p2 is a distance r from p2 and is oriented poitning right

ok first of all the field at p2 due to p1 is

E = \frac{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} (3(\vec{p}\bullet\hat{r})-\vec{p}) = \frac{p_{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} (3pr\cos\theta - p)

theta is pi/2 so
E = \frac{-p_{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3}

then the magnitude of torque on p2 is
N = p_{2} \times \frac{-p_{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3}

p2 points in the y
p1 in the z
y cross z is positive x
is this correct??
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    4 KB · Views: 1,154
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks mostly right. Two small comments:
1) you left out an r-hat in the first equation
2) y cross z is plus x as you say but E has a minus sign so torque is along -x
 
marcusl said:
Looks mostly right. Two small comments:
1) you left out an r-hat in the first equation
2) y cross z is plus x as you say but E has a minus sign so torque is along -x

good point i forgot about hte minus sign
it is -x

thanks a lot!
 
this time r points to the left (correct?)
so the angle between p2 and r is -pi? E =\frac{p_{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} (3(\vec{p_{2}}\bullet\hat{-r} \cos\theta - \vec{p}) = \frac{p_{1}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} (-3p_{2}r\cos\theta - \vec{p_{2}}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} 2p_{2}

is that correct? the electric field points to the right??

now let s see if that makes snese intuitively

suppose you are 'behind' the negative charge of a dipole very far away such that r>> d (d is the separation of the dipole) then the electric field due to the two charges points toward the dipole?? because the negative cahrge 'slightly' dominates over the positive charge?

the torque as a result is

\vec{N} = p_{1} \hat{z} \times \frac{2p_{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} \hat{y} = \frac{2p_{1}p_{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} r^3} (-\hat{x})

the answers are differnet in magnitude but same direction
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K