Calculating eigenstates of an operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the eigenstates of a two-dimensional operator expressed in terms of orthonormal state vectors. The operator is defined with parameters that vary in specific cases, and participants are tasked with expressing the operator as a matrix and finding its eigenstates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the equations derived from applying the operator to the eigenstates. There is exploration of the conditions under which the coefficients of the eigenstates can be zero or non-zero, leading to questions about the nature of the solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining different cases for the parameters and questioning the validity of their solutions. Some participants suggest that there may be non-trivial solutions, while others explore the implications of orthogonality in finding additional eigenstates.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of linear algebra rules and the definitions of eigenstates and eigenvalues. The problem setup includes specific values for parameters that influence the eigenstate calculations.

barefeet
Messages
58
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider a two-dimensional space spanned by two orthonormal state vectors [itex]\mid \alpha \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\mid \beta \rangle[/itex]. An operator is expressed in terms of these vectors as
[tex]A = \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha \mid + \lambda \mid \beta \rangle \langle \alpha \mid + \lambda^* \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \beta \mid + \mu \mid \beta \rangle \langle \beta \mid[/tex]

Determine the eigenstates of A for the case where (i) [itex]\lambda = 1, \mu = \pm 1[/itex], (ii) [itex]\lambda = i, \mu = \pm 1[/itex]. Do this problem also by expressing A as a 2 X 2 matrix with eigenstates as the column vectors.

Homework Equations


Just linear algebra rules.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with [itex]\lambda = 1, \mu = 1[/itex]. Then A is:
[tex]A = \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha \mid + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \alpha \mid + \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \beta \mid + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \beta \mid[/tex]

[tex]A \mid \alpha \rangle = \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha \mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \alpha \mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \beta \mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \beta \mid \alpha \rangle = \mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle[/tex]

[tex]A \mid \beta \rangle = \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \alpha \mid \beta \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \alpha \mid \beta \rangle + \mid \alpha \rangle \langle \beta \mid \beta \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle \langle \beta \mid \beta \rangle = \mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle[/tex]

The eigenstate is [itex]\mid a_n \rangle[/itex] with eigenvalue [itex]a_n[/itex]. Then the following holds:
[tex]A \mid a_n \rangle = a_n \mid a_n \rangle[/tex]

The eigenstate [itex]\mid a_n \rangle[/itex] can be expressed in the basis vectors [itex]\mid \alpha \rangle[/itex] and [itex]\mid \beta \rangle[/itex]:

[tex]\mid a_n \rangle = c_1 \mid \alpha \rangle + c_2 \mid \beta \rangle[/tex]

Then the earlier equation becomes:
[tex]A \mid a_n \rangle = A( c_1 \mid \alpha \rangle + c_2 \mid \beta \rangle ) = a_n (c_1 \mid \alpha \rangle + c_2 \mid \beta \rangle[/tex]

But this is also:
[tex]A( c_1 \mid \alpha \rangle + c_2 \mid \beta \rangle ) = c_1 A \mid \alpha \rangle + c_2 A \mid \beta \rangle = c_1 (\mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle) + c_2 (\mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle) \\ = (c_1 + c_2) \mid \alpha \rangle + (c_1 + c_2) \mid \beta \rangle[/tex]

This gives the equations :
[tex]a_n c_1 = c_1 + c_2[/tex]
[tex]a_n c_2 = c_1 + c_2[/tex]

The only solution is if [itex]c_1 = c_2 = 0[/itex]. Obviously I am doing something wrong but I can't see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
barefeet said:
This gives the equations :
[tex]a_n c_1 = c_1 + c_2[/tex]
[tex]a_n c_2 = c_1 + c_2[/tex]
The only solution is if [itex]c_1 = c_2 = 0[/itex]. Obviously I am doing something wrong but I can't see it.
Are you sure that's the only solution?
 
I see, but I still get one non trivial solution out of it.
If one is 0, then both are 0. So they are either both nonzero or both 0. If they are nonzero, I can write:
[tex]a_n = \frac{c_1 + c_2}{c_1} = \frac{c_1 + c_2}{c_2}[/tex]
If [itex]c_1 + c_2 =0[/itex] then [itex]a_n =0[/itex] or the c's are 0. If [itex]c_1 + c_2[/itex] is nonzero, then I can divide by it and gives me [itex]c_1 = c_2[/itex] with [itex]a_n = 2[/itex] Unnormalized I can take as eigenstate [itex]\mid \alpha \rangle + \mid \beta \rangle[/itex].
Now I can't find the other eigenstate. [itex]\mid \alpha \rangle - \mid \beta \rangle[/itex] is orthogonal to this eigenstate but letting A operate on it gives me 0. Or does this just mean that it is an eigenstate with eigenvalue 0?
 
barefeet said:
Or does this just mean that it is an eigenstate with eigenvalue 0?
That's it.

Another approach is to subtract the two equations:
##a_nc_1 = c_1+c_2##
##a_nc_2 = c_1+c_2##
 
Thanks again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K