Calculating eigenvectors of complex numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvectors of a given 2x2 matrix with complex eigenvalues. Participants are exploring the process of deriving eigenvectors from the characteristic equation and the implications of complex numbers in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the characteristic equation and the resulting complex eigenvalues. There are attempts to solve the system of equations derived from substituting eigenvalues into the matrix equation. Questions arise regarding the linear dependence of the equations and the validity of the proposed eigenvectors. Some participants also express confusion about the choice of specific eigenvectors presented in a referenced solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and interpretations. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in working with complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Some guidance has been offered regarding checking the results by multiplying the matrix with the proposed eigenvectors, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the eigenvectors derived.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of complex eigenvalues and their corresponding eigenvectors. There is mention of potential infinite solutions and the implications of specific numerical choices in the context of eigenvectors. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the standard forms of eigenvectors and their representation.

boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the eigenvectors of the matrix A


Homework Equations





3. The attempt at the solution

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

First I find the characteristic equation [itex]A - \lambda I[/itex]

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-\lambda & -5 \\1 & 0-\lambda \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

and solve

[itex]\lambda^2-4\lambda+5=0[/itex]

which gives the complex eigenvalues [itex]2-i,2+i[/itex]

we need to solve

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-(2-i) & -5 \\1 & 0-(2-i) \end{array} \right)\] X = 0[/itex]

and

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4-(2+i) & -5 \\1 & 0-(2+i) \end{array} \right)\] X = 0[/itex]

for the first one I get to

[itex] (2-i)x - 5y = 0 [/itex]
[itex] x - 2-iy = 0[/itex]

I start to get lost after here any help grately appreciated
regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So far it looks fine.
Now you have two equations in two unknowns, so you can try to solve them. You will find that they are linearly dependent, so you will only get an expression of the form x = a y.
An eigenvector is then (1, a); the eigenspace is the span of this vector, namely { (x, ax) | x any real number }.
 
So from the 2 equations I get.

[itex](2-i)x = 5y[/itex]
and
[itex]x = (2-i)y[/itex]

so is the first eigen vector

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 2-i \end{array} \right)\][/itex] ?



for the second
[itex](2+i)x - 5y = 0[/itex]
[itex]x - (2+)iy = 0[/itex]

I get

[itex](2+i)x = 5y[/itex]
and
[itex]x = (2+i)y[/itex]

so is the second eigen vector

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 2+i \end{array} \right)\][/itex] ?



regards
Brendan
 
There's an easy way to check your answer... multiply your supposed eigenvectors with the matrix, and check that you get the eigenvector times the corresponding eigenvalue back :)

(Didn't check your calculation, but the result looks good, though)
 
I multiplied the matrix and the first vector
[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex][itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\2-i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

and got

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}-6+5i \\1 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


than Imultiplied the eigenvalue by the associated eigenvector

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}2-i \end{array} \right)\][/itex][itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 \\2-i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


and got

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}2+i \\5 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


So not sure what's going on
 
I have had a look at the solution given and this is the way that was shown.

from

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


you try and diagonalise the matrix.


So

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


becomes

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}0 & 0 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


and you solve for zero with the eigen values obtained earlier to produce the eigenvectors using

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 & 0-\lambda \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

so solve

[itex]x-(2-i)y=0[/itex]

you do the same with the other eigenvalue [itex]2+i[/itex]

I don't know how they came to the following eigen vector did they just pick the numbers or was there a particular reason. They gave the eigenvector as

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 \\ 2-i\end{array} \right)\][/itex]
and
[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 \\ 2+i\end{array} \right)\][/itex]

I suppose there are infinite solutions but maybe because of the -5 above?

They use the vectors and call this the transition matrix

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 & 5 \\2-i & 2+i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

Next they take the inverse of the transition matrix

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}\frac{1}{10}-\frac{1}{5}\times 1 & \frac{1}{2}\times i \\\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{5}\times 1 & -\frac{1}{2}\times i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

and multiply that by the original matrix then the transition matrix.

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}4 & -5 \\1 & 0 \end{array} \right)\][/itex]

and

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}5 & 5 \\2-i & 2+i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


which gives the diagonalised matrix

[itex]\[ \left( \begin{array}{cc}2+i & 0 \\0 & 2-i \end{array} \right)\][/itex]


which proves that they are the right eigenvectors.

Can someone please let me know why the chose those particular eigienvectros ?
As I could not simulate the last with those vectors.

regards
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K