Calculating Electric Potential in a Uniformly Charged Spherical Shell

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 3K views
sm09
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A non conducting spherical shell is uniformly charged. The electrostatic potential at the centre is 200v and the electrostatic potential at the distance r=50cm from the centre is 40v. Find the radius of sphere a.

I am not sure where go with this.

I know that the potential difference is equal to the work done in moving from one point to another.

Any help or direction would be appreciated,

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the shell theorem?

If so, what does it tell you about the potential inside a uniformly charged shell? And what is the potential outside the shell?

Frame equations based on answers to the above questions, and you should be able to solve for radius.
 
But the question states that the potential inside the shell is 200v
 
sm09 said:
But the question states that the potential inside the shell is 200v

Yes it does. How can you express the potential inside the shell mathematically? Say the shell has a charge Q, radius R.
 
sm09 said:
Q/r^2

Noo!

You need to add in the constant of proportionality [itex]k=1/4\pi \epsilon[/itex] before you can use that. And even then, kQ/r2 is the electric field outside the shell. You need the potential inside the shell...
 
Is the potential energy constant through the shell?
 
sm09 said:
Is the potential energy constant through the shell?

Yes it is. Or equivalently, the electric potential is constant throughout the shell. That's indirectly what the shell theorem states...
 
So obviously r has to be less that 50cm.

Can we say Q/r^2= 200v and Q/(r^2 - 50^2) = 40v?

Then we can find Q and substitute it into one of the equations so find r?
 
sm09 said:
So obviously r has to be less that 50cm.

Yes! :approve:

Can we say Q/r^2= 200v and Q/(r^2 - 50^2) = 40v?

You didn't pay attention to this post..

Infinitum said:
You need to add in the constant of proportionality [itex]k=1/4πϵ[/itex] before you can use that. And even then, kQ/r2 is the electric field outside the shell. You need the potential inside the shell...
 
Yes my mistake. Thanks for your help. Was slightly confused at first but now makes sense.

Very much appreciated
 
sm09 said:
Yes my mistake. Thanks for your help. Was slightly confused at first but now makes sense.

Very much appreciated

Glad you figured it out. :smile: