Calculating Electromagnetic Wave Intensity in a 30 sq m Room

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the intensity of electromagnetic waves in a 30 square meter room, one must consider the type of device used to generate the waves, typically a transmitter with an aerial. The intensity is influenced by the room's wall composition, as most power radiated will escape through the walls and be absorbed by materials. For example, in a hypothetical spherical room with 100 square meters of wall area and a 100W transmitter, the intensity would be 1W per square meter. The discussion highlights the importance of specifying whether the waves are radio or light and the effects of wall reflectivity on energy density. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate intensity calculations.
practicaleducator
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If I build a machine that its sole purpose is to radiate xx Hz of electromagnetic wave, how do I calculate the intensity of the waves? Let's say I put it in the room of 30 sq meters.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. That's a tough question to answer because you are not specifying enough. A "machine" is not normally the way we'd go about producing EM waves. I assume. you mean an electronic device of some sort - we could call that a Transmitter with an aerial and the room would have 'normal' walls; i.e. not metal, other than the odd bits of metal in the wiring and a couple of steel beams. If you're talking in terms of Radio Frequency waves, most of the Power that the transmitter produces would escape through the walls and some of it would be absorbed in the material.
You are jumping into the subject more than half way and it would be more usual to talk in terms of putting the aerial out in 'free space', where it would be radiating its power equally in all directions. (This is actually impossible to achieve and most aerials will have some significant directivity over just a range of directions but just let's assume it's omnidirectional) and that the wavelength is around 0.1m (so it's not large compared with the room size).

If you looked at the Power radiated through the walls of a spherical (well why not?) room with a total wall area of 100m2 and, if the transmitter was radiating 100W, then the 'intensity' of the radiated power through the walls would be 100/100 = 1W per m2. If you had a bigger room with 1000m2 of wall area then the intensity would be 0.1W/m2 as it spreads out over ten times the area etc. etc.

Now tell us what you were really wondering about. It sounds like the results of a conversation in a pub near closing time.(?):smile: Is this a Health and Safety question?
 
Is it radio or light?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
anorlunda said:
Is it radio or light?
Would it matter, in an ideal case? If the walls are reflective then, as in the RF case, the energy density would depend on the absorption coefficient. Iirc there was a similar thread not long ago in which the total energy stored in the room space would be equal to the power input divided by the fraction absorbed. This would be true whether or not there is a resonance but the transmitter matching might need to be re-tuned to obtain the same power input.

This may not be helping the OP, though.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top