Electromagnetic waves: Photons generated by two charges attracted to each other?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between photons and electromagnetic waves, particularly in the context of two charges attracting each other. Participants explore the implications of this relationship on the behavior of electric fields and the nature of forces in quantum electrodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that photons are electromagnetic waves and convey electrical force, raising a thought experiment about two attracting charges and the orientation of electric field vectors.
  • Another participant argues against the notion that photons and electromagnetic waves are equivalent, stating that photons do not operate as the participant initially described and that electromagnetic waves should be understood through classical methods before considering photons.
  • A third participant emphasizes the need to unlearn the idea of photon-wave equivalence, asserting that electromagnetic energy can be treated as either waves or photons depending on convenience, but they are not interchangeable.
  • One participant advises against trying to understand forces in terms of photons without a solid grasp of quantum electrodynamics and its mathematics, suggesting that ordinary language is insufficient for accurate explanations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the relationship between photons and electromagnetic waves, with no consensus reached on how to reconcile these concepts in the context of forces between charged particles.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of quantum electrodynamics and the necessity of understanding its mathematical framework to accurately discuss the behavior of photons and electromagnetic forces.

frustrationboltzmann
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Hello all,

after thinking about properties of electromagnetic waves, especially concerning the electric field of them, I ran into some serious understanding problems:

1) photons are electromagnetic waves and vice versa and they convey electrical force. Let's now do a thought experiment: let's assume 2 free charges in vacuum, which attract each other. let's say an electron and a proton a little distance from each other. when they attract each other the electric field vector has to lie on the "line" connecting them, in order to accelerate the 2 particles to each other. the conveying photons are now sent on the same line between the particles...but wait, now the k-vector and the E-vector of the electric field would be not normal to each other, like maxwell´s equations would assume but parallel. how can this work without contradiction or did I understand some aspect wrongly?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are misunderstanding the relationship between photons and electromagnetic waves; photons do not work anything like the way you're thinking. Although they are "the carriers of the electrical force" that doesn't mean what it sounds like; they don't move between two charged particles being attracted or repelled by electrical forces. They are not electromagnetic waves and electromagnetic waves are not made up of a stream of photons flowing by.

There's no really good way of describing what a photon is in a B-level thread; the simplest remotely reasonable explanation that I know of is http://www.physics.usu.edu/torre/3700_Spring_2015/What_is_a_photon.pdf, and the mathematical price of admission is substantial. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/photon/schmoton.htm is also a good read, as is http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/virtual_particles.html (this one addresses the connection between photon exchange and electromagnetic forces most directly). You'll also find some pretty good informal descriptions in some of our older threads if you search around.

You only need to consider photons when working with problems in which quantum mechanical effects are significant. You have to completely understand electromagnetic waves using Maxwell's equations and other classical methods before you can start thinking about photons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SydneyBird, sophiecentaur and davenn
frustrationboltzmann said:
1) photons are electromagnetic waves and vice versa
You really must try to unlearn that idea. EM energy can be treated in terms of waves or in terms of photons, depending which is more convenient at the time. The 'duality' notion that's still popular with non-physicists these days, actually died a death several decades ago. A photon cannot be given a valid description using waves, and vice versa.
Read what @Nugatory says above.
 
frustrationboltzmann said:
when they attract each other the electric field vector has to lie on the "line" connecting them, in order to accelerate the 2 particles to each other. the conveying photons are now sent on the same line between the particles...but wait, now the k-vector and the E-vector of the electric field would be not normal to each other, like maxwell´s equations would assume but parallel. how can this work without contradiction or did I understand some aspect wrongly?

I wouldn't even attempt to understand forces in terms of photons without first spending a significant amount of time learning about quantum electrodynamics and its underlying math. Ordinary language and experience is woefully inadequate to explain this using photons, so you must spend time learning at least a little bit of a new language (that of QED and its math) and getting some experience in accurately understanding various quantum phenomenon. And note that when I say 'accurate', I mean it. Watching a few youtube videos will not cut it.

Here's a good site to start with: https://profmattstrassler.com/artic...-basics/fields-and-their-particles-with-math/

There are dozens of short articles on various aspects of particle physics on that site. Just use the drop down menu at the top labeled 'Articles'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
900
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K