Question about intensity of EM waves

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
For electromagnetic wave if it's reflected from a perfect conductor standing wave can be form. I wonder why Poynting vector can be used to describe the intensity of standing EM wave. (see p.19 of http://web.mit.edu/viz/EM/visualizations/coursenotes/modules/guide13.pdf ).

From some textbooks the Poynting vector is used to describe the intensity of traveling wave. It is derived from wave without reflection and since Maxwell's equations are obeyed and therefore cB=E. However in standing wave since E=2Eo cos(kx)cos(ωt) and B=2Bo sin(kx)sin(ωt), the E and B do not obey cB=E at every point and the overall wave is not traveling in any direction.

Another question is, the Poynting vector of standing wave is pointing perpendicular to the E and B field and sometime has positive and negative value. It means that energy is transmitting to either directions in different times. However for standing wave cB=E is not obeyed, does it contradict Maxwell's equation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gruxg
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

One thing to keep in mind is that Poynting's vector is, well, a vector: ##\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H} ##. You really do want to keep the vectorial nature whenever dealing with it. Also, Poynting's vector comes out of Poynting's theorem:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting's_theorem

This is derived for any electromagnetic field, not just waves. (It does not matter whether or not E=cB). In your case you have no Joule heating (no ##\mathbf{J \cdot E}## term). Consider the integral version in the link: it simply says that for a volume V that is enclosed in some surface S, the electromagnetic energy stored int he volume (volume integral of u) decreases when there is a net flux of power through the surface (integral of Poynting vector).

For your case it would be interesting to compute and plot the terms in the differential version. In your case, if the waves are propagating in the ##\pm \hat{\mathbf{z}} ##, ## \nabla \cdot \mathbf{S} = \frac{\partial}{\partial z} S_z ##, where ##S_z## is the z component of the POynting vector.

jason

EDIT: I found the notes you referenced a little hard to skim - but in case you are not familiar with D and H in the link I gave, in free space (like you have), ##\mathbf{D}=\epsilon_0 \mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{B}=\mu_0 \mathbf{H}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kelvin490
kelvin490 said:
However for standing wave cB=E is not obeyed, does it contradict Maxwell's equation?
No. Maxwells equations do not require cB=E in all cases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kelvin490 and jasonRF