Calculating Electron Energy in a One-Dimensional Potential Well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of an electron in a one-dimensional potential well, specifically focusing on the implications of the well's width measured in angstroms and the concept of zero-point energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the potential well, with some clarifying that it is an infinite square well. There are questions about the appropriate equations to use and the implications of the potential barriers being infinitely high.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the problem's context and related concepts, while others have expressed uncertainty about the calculations involved. There is a mix of attempts to clarify the setup and explore the mathematical framework without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the significance of the angstrom unit in the problem and mention that the original poster is seeking assistance with the calculations, indicating a focus on understanding rather than simply obtaining answers.

delrepublica
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Energy in a Potential Well

I so need help with this!

"The width of a one-dimensional potential well of an electron can be assumed to be about 2 A (there's a weird-looking bubble on top of the A). Calculate the energy of an electron (in Joules and in eV) from this information for various values of n. Give the zero-point energy."

Ok, so i know that if it's a one-dimensional potential well, the walls have infinetely high potential barriers. In other words, V0 is equal to infinity.

Could someone please help me out on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi delrepublica! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I've no idea how to do that problem …

but I just thought I'd say hello! … :smile:

and tell you that you can impress your friends and professors by producing your own "weird-looking bubble": if you type alt-capital-A, it prints Å. :smile:
 
The [tex]\AA[/tex] stands for the Swedish name of the physicist [tex]\AA[/tex]ngstrom,
which is how this practical atomic length unit is pronounced (if you can pronounce Swedish).
Not all quantum wells are infinite square wells, but if this one is, it should be fully worked out in your textbook.
 
Last edited:
particle in a box (also known as the infinite potential well or the infinite square well) is a problem consisting a single particle inside of an infinitely deep potential well, from which it cannot escape, and which loses no energy when it collides with the walls of the box. In classical mechanics, the solution to the problem is trivial: The particle moves in a straight line, always at the same speed, until it reflects from a wall.

The problem becomes very interesting when one attempts a quantum-mechanical solution, since many fundamental quantum mechanical concepts need to be introduced in order to find the solution. Nevertheless, it remains a very simple and solvable problem. This article will only be concerned with the quantum mechanical solution.

The problem may be expressed in any number of dimensions, but the simplest problem is one dimensional, while the most useful solution is the particle in the three dimensional box. In one dimension this amounts to the particle existing on a line segment, with the "walls" being the endpoints of the segment.

In physical terms, the particle in a box is defined as a single point particle, enclosed in a box inside of which it experiences no force whatsoever, i.e. it is at zero potential energy. At the walls of the box, the potential rises to infinity, forming an impenetrable wall. Using this description in terms of potentials allows the Schrödinger equation to be used to determine the solution.
 
Thank you guys so much for your help!
And yes, the A is angstroms, which made everything sooo much easier!

All I needed to do to solve it was use the equation En = [(Dirac's constant)^2 * pi^2 * n^2] / [2m* L^2]

and for the zero-point energy you just use n=1, so easy enough =)
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K