Calculating Energy-Momentum Tensor in GR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the calculation of the energy-momentum tensor \( T_{\mu\nu} \) in General Relativity (GR) using the action \( S_M \) for a scalar field \( \phi \). The action is expressed as \( S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \left( g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu \phi \nabla_\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 \right) \). The variation of the action leads to the expression \( T_{\mu\nu} = - \left( \nabla_\mu \phi \nabla_\nu \phi + \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu\nu} m^2 \phi^2 \right) \). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying variations and maintaining proper indices throughout the derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with variational calculus in the context of physics
  • Knowledge of scalar fields and their role in field theories
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein field equations from the action principle
  • Learn about the role of the metric tensor \( g_{\mu\nu} \) in GR
  • Explore the implications of the energy-momentum tensor in cosmology
  • Investigate variations of other field theories, such as electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity and field theory, will benefit from this discussion.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
During the derivation of the Einstein field equations via the variation principle we defined the energy momentum tensor to be
$$T_{\mu\nu} \equiv -2\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\frac{\delta S_M}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}}.$$
Assume now that
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2),$$
where ##\phi## is the scalar field. $Calculate ##T_{\mu\nu}##.
Relevant Equations
All given above
My attempt was to first rewrite ##S_M## slightly to make it more clear where ##g_{\mu\nu}## appears
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2).$$
Now we can apply the variation:
$$\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}\left(- \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} [g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2] + \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}\\
&= \int d^4x \frac{\sqrt{-g}}{2}\left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}.
\end{align*}$$
We then have
$$\frac{\delta S_M}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} = \frac{\sqrt{-g}}{2}\left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right) \quad \Rightarrow \quad T_{\mu\nu} = - \left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right)$$
Is this sensible? I'm not really sure if I performed the variation correctly, so I would appreciate if someone could give it a look.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Markus Kahn said:
Assume now that
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2),$$
where ##\phi## is the scalar field. $$
Usually there is a factor of 1/2 multiplying ##\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi##. I just wanted to verify that for your problem there is no such factor of 1/2.
$$\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi
\end{align*}$$
In the second line you have too many ##\mu##, ##\nu## indices which is causing problems in your derivation.
In the second line, I suggest writing ##(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2)## with different summation indices, e.g., as ##(g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2)##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
You are absolutely right, there should be a ##1/2## in front of the first term... I completely overlooked this. With this in mind we have
$$
\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \\
&= \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}\left( -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\left[\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2\right] + \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}
\end{align*}
$$
Which then would give
$$T_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\nu}\left[\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2\right] -2 \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi.$$
I don't see how this could be simplified further (if it can), maybe contracting one of the covariant derivatives with the metric, but other than that...
 
Markus Kahn said:
$$
\delta S_M = \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi$$
That missing factor of 1/2 should also appear in the second integral above.

Getting all the signs right is a headache. I haven't checked them carefully. Make sure you have all your signs correct in the original expression for the action.

I don't see any way to simplify the answer further.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K