Calculating Energy Stored in a Wire: Young's Modulus, F, L, & a

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Properties
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the total energy stored in a wire subjected to an external force, incorporating concepts of Young's modulus, stress, and strain. The original poster presents a formula for energy storage and seeks validation against a textbook answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between tension, extension, and Young's modulus, referencing Hooke's law. There are attempts to derive the energy stored using different formulations, with some questioning the inclusion of cross-sectional area in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of Young's modulus and its application in the context of the problem. Some have provided guidance on definitions and relationships, while others express confusion regarding the textbook's treatment of the topic. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of differing definitions of Young's modulus across sources, with some participants noting potential discrepancies in units and terminology used in textbooks. The original poster's concern about an upcoming exam adds a layer of urgency to the discussion.

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
Please help me with this problem.
# A wire of cross sectional area a, length L and young’s modulus Y is extended by an external force F. What is the total energy stored in the wire?
I solved it in the following way:

Energy stored = ½ x stress x strain
= (½) x (F/a) x (dL/L)
= (½) x (F/a) x (F/aY)
= (1/2) x (F^2/a^2Y)

Is it right? But the answer given in my book is ½(YF^2L/a).
Here the symbol ^ represents power and x represents multiplication.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hooke's law relates tension (T) to extension (x) in a wire in relative to it's original length(L) and young's modulus ([itex]\lambda[/itex]);
[tex]T = \frac{\lambda x}{L}[/tex]
Energy stored is simply work done by stretching the wire, which is force multiplied by distance moved, which is given by integrating Hooke's law between the limits of zero and maximum extension (e);
[tex]E_p = \int_{0}^{e} \frac{\lambda x}{L} \;\; dx = \frac{\lambda e^2}{2L}[/tex]
 
Hootenanny said:
Hooke's law relates tension (T) to extension (x) in a wire in relative to it's original length(L) and young's modulus ([itex]\lambda[/itex]);
[tex]T = \frac{\lambda x}{L}[/tex]
You're missing the area. If [itex]\lambda[/itex] is Young's modulus, then:
[tex]T = A \frac{\lambda x}{L}[/tex]
 
Doc Al said:
You're missing the area. If [itex]\lambda[/itex] is Young's modulus, then:
[tex]T = A \frac{\lambda x}{L}[/tex]

Indeed, I stand corrected, I have just work through the derivation using stress and strain. However, glancing through my textbooks it appears that they make no mention of area and states the [itex]\lambda[/itex] is simply the modulus of elasticity, which is the same as young's modulus. I am now rather confused and worried with regards to my upcomming exam :confused: Could you enlighten my Doc Al?
 
Not sure about bringing enlightenment before having coffee, but the standard definition of Young's modulus is Stress (F/A) over Strain ([itex]\Delta L / L[/itex]). How does your text define it?

See here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/permot3.html#c2

Except for leaving out the area, your analysis is perfectly correct.

Note to Amith2006:
Amith2006 said:
But the answer given in my book is ½(YF^2L/a).
Check the units of that answer; the correct answer must have units of energy.
 
Doc Al said:
Not sure about bringing enlightenment before having coffee

I've just had a big cup :-p

Doc Al said:

Yeah, I've just been reading through that and agree with it totally.

Just reading through my text(applied mathematics textbook) it says that;
The units of [itex]\lambda[/itex] are Newtons
However, I know from my physics that youngs modulus is defined as;
[tex]\lambda = \frac{FL}{Ax}[/tex]
which should leave units as [itex]N\cdot m^{-3}[/itex]. Perhaps the applied mathematics textbook is using a different constant and incorrectly naming it the 'modulus of elasticity'?
 
Hootenanny said:
Perhaps the applied mathematics textbook is using a different constant and incorrectly naming it the 'modulus of elasticity'?
That must be it. No problem as long as you use the definition consistently. (But it looks like the OP is using the standard definition--so be careful!)

Funny, I just saw another problem where this same issue came up (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=113574); wonder if that fellow is using the same text.
 
Looks like he is, it's a pretty standard text for A-Level Mathematics, funny I haven't noticed it before. I'll just have to remember that my physics exam uses the 'proper' youngs modulus! Thanks for you help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K