Calculating Error in Resistance Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter khizman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Numbers
Click For Summary
Measuring resistance with a voltmeter and ammeter can introduce errors due to rounding of displayed values. For instance, a voltage reading of 1.45V could actually range from 1.445V to 1.455V, leading to a maximum error of ±0.005V. This rounding affects the calculated resistance, which is determined by the formula R = V/I, necessitating careful consideration of both maximum and minimum values for accurate results. The nominal resistance measurement can be expressed with its associated error range, such as R = 3.22 [+0.047 / -0.046] Ω. Accurate resistance calculations often require the use of spreadsheets to manage the complexity of error propagation.
khizman
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Rounded Numbers --> error?

Say i am measuring resistance of a wire, i have a voltmetre and an ammetre set up to work out the resistance.

Votmetere says 1.45 and ammetre says 0.45, this wint be enirely aacurate would it? arnt the numbers rounded off on the screen?

So what part does this play in errors? absolute and relative>?

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously the voltage is not exactly 1.45 volts and the current isn't exactly .45 amps.

As far as the type of error, think of the way it rounds. If the voltage is read as 1.45 that could mean that the actual voltage is anywhere from 1.445 to 1.455. Notice that 1.45 is exactly in the middle of the range of actual readings that yield 1.45 when rounded. You can express that reading as 1.45 +/- .005. (Someone please correct me if I made a mistake in the decimals. It doesn't really matter when it comes to answering the original question though)

What kind of error does that represent then?

Of course I assumed that the meter actually rounds the number instead of just chopping the extra digits off.
 
Last edited:
As dav said the maximum error is \pm 0.005, however, you have to be carefull when calculating the resultant error on your resistance calculations. Resistance is given by;

R = \frac{V}{I}

Therefore, the maximum error for your resistance would be given by the largest possible voltage divided by the smallest possible resistance. For example, if your intruments displayed values of 1.45V and 0.45A, then your largest possible resistance would be;

R = \frac{1.45 + 0.005}{0.45 - 0.005} = \frac{1.455}{0.445} \approx 3.26966

The smallest your resistance could possible be is;

R = \frac{1.45 - 0.005}{0.45 + 0.005} = \frac{1.445}{0.455} \approx 3.17582

Your 'nominal value' (what you actually measured) would be;

R = \frac{1.45}{0.45} = \frac{29}{9} \approx 3.22222

You would then need to calculate the difference between your nominal and maximum and minimum and you would quote your answer as;

R = 3.22 [+0.047 / - 0.046] \Omega

It is very time consuming to do this by hand and I usually set up a speadsheet to do the calculations for me.

Regards
-Hoot

(Correct me if my calcs are wrong)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K