Calculating Expectation for a Random Walk with a Time-Varying Function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 5K views
Steve10
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have a random function f(n) which takes the values +/- 1 with equal probability.
Let the variable X take the sum of the values of f(n) after n steps. Then I can write,
[tex]X(T) = \sum_{n=0}^T f(n)[/tex] where T = 0,1,2,... and X(0) = 0.
And I can write the expectation of X as,
[tex]<X> = < \sum_{n=0}^T f(n) > = \sum_{n=0}^T <f(n) > = 0[/tex] since <f(n)> = 0 (by definition).
My question:
if, instead [tex]X(n) = \sum_{k=0}^n e^{-\mu k} f(n-k)[/tex] then, for the expectaion of X, can I write,
[tex]< X(n)> = \sum_{k=0}^n e^{-\mu k} < f(n-k) >[/tex]
or even,
[tex]< X(n)> = \sum_{k=0}^n < e^{-\mu k}> < f(n-k) >[/tex]
If I can do either of the above then can I also use <f(n)> = 0 to say that <X(n)> = 0, which I'm pretty sure it would have to be to answer the rest of my question.

TIA
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out one important definition - what is mu? Is it a random variable or is it a constant? If it is random, how does it relate to f(n)? If it is constant or independent of f(n), then your conclusion is correct.
 
Thanks, I should have mentined that about mu. It is a constant value.
So I was correct after all. :smile:
I guess that's just as well, since I'm already typing up my results based on that conclusion!
Many thanks for the confirmation.
 
Last edited: