Calculating Expectation for a Random Walk with a Time-Varying Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
Steve10
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have a random function f(n) which takes the values +/- 1 with equal probability.
Let the variable X take the sum of the values of f(n) after n steps. Then I can write,
X(T) = \sum_{n=0}^T f(n) where T = 0,1,2,... and X(0) = 0.
And I can write the expectation of X as,
&lt;X&gt; = &lt; \sum_{n=0}^T f(n) &gt; = \sum_{n=0}^T &lt;f(n) &gt; = 0 since <f(n)> = 0 (by definition).
My question:
if, instead X(n) = \sum_{k=0}^n e^{-\mu k} f(n-k) then, for the expectaion of X, can I write,
&lt; X(n)&gt; = \sum_{k=0}^n e^{-\mu k} &lt; f(n-k) &gt;
or even,
&lt; X(n)&gt; = \sum_{k=0}^n &lt; e^{-\mu k}&gt; &lt; f(n-k) &gt;
If I can do either of the above then can I also use <f(n)> = 0 to say that <X(n)> = 0, which I'm pretty sure it would have to be to answer the rest of my question.

TIA
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You left out one important definition - what is mu? Is it a random variable or is it a constant? If it is random, how does it relate to f(n)? If it is constant or independent of f(n), then your conclusion is correct.
 
Thanks, I should have mentined that about mu. It is a constant value.
So I was correct after all. :smile:
I guess that's just as well, since I'm already typing up my results based on that conclusion!
Many thanks for the confirmation.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top