Calculating Final Speed & Energy of 0.1 Solar Mass Falling into the Sun

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the final speed and energy of an object with a mass of 0.1 Solar masses falling into the Sun from rest at infinity. The context includes gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy considerations, as well as the mass and radius of the Sun.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy to relate potential and kinetic energy, with some exploring the implications of the mass of the falling object and the Sun's motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using energy conservation principles, while others are clarifying the roles of different masses in the equations. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions involved in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is simplified for grading purposes, allowing them to ignore the motion of the Sun and focus on the falling object's dynamics. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding the variables used in the equations.

Ayame17
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(b) If an object of 0.1 Solar masses fell into the Sun (starting at rest at infinity) calculate what its final speed and energy would be.

Mass of the Sun = 1.99 x 10^{30} kg
Radius of the Sun = 6.96 x 10^8 m

The Attempt at a Solution



Having done the rest of the question (parts a, c and d), I returned to this part but am having trouble. A couple of years ago we studied free-fall time, but in this question we really aren't given much data. If I had the time, I could backwards-engineer the free fall time to get the velocity, but we don't. Having looked through my notes, I found the free fall velocity:

v_{ff} = (\frac{2GM}{R})^\frac{1}{2}

We thought that integration may be the way to go, but we wouldn't know what with respect to - if we did it to r, then we could put in infinity and zero, but that goes a bit weird. I believe that the R in that equation should be the radius of the object, that we don't know! Also, we want to find the velocity, so changing it to \frac{dr}{dt} won't actually help us. Anyone know where we'd begin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat this as a conservation of energy problem. (That's where your equation for free fall speed comes from.) What's the change in PE when that mass goes from ∞ to the Sun's radius?
 
Ah, I think I see what you're getting at. KE + PE = 0 therefore

\frac{1}{2}v^2 = \frac{GM_{0}}{R} - \frac{GM_{0}}{R_{0}}

meaning that our velocity would be like the equation from my original post but where R is the radius of the Sun, R_{0} is infinity, making that term disappear, and M_{0} is the mass of the falling object, giving a v_{ff} of ~195.3 km/s. Did I do that right?
 
M0 is not the mass of the falling object. (Note that the mass of the object canceled out from your equation.)

This also assumes that you can ignore the motion of the Sun itself. Probably not the best idea, since the falling object has significant mass. To be a bit more accurate, figure out the speeds of both falling mass and sun. (Assuming both start out at rest.)
 
Thankfully, this question is only a couple of marks, we've been advised to ignore the Sun's motion for this. Going from the equation and making M_{0} the mass of the Sun, gives the freefall velocity the same value as the escape velocity for the Sun. Would that be correct?
 
Yes. Solving for the escape velocity is just the inverse of this problem. Same equation!
 
Thanks ever so much! We were trying to go straight from the equation without taking into account where it comes from. We also have a slight tendency to overthink things! Thanks for your help! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K