Calculating First Meeting Point of Pulses in a Stretched Wire

  • Thread starter Thread starter nick85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves Wire
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the first meeting point of two pulses in a stretched wire, specifically a 5.0 m wire with a mass of 130 g and tension of 220 N. The wave speed was calculated to be 91.9866 m/s using the formula v = √(T/(m/L)). The correct meeting point of the pulses was determined to be 1.12 m from the left end of the wire, after resolving an error in the initial calculations regarding the time delay of 30 ms. The final consensus confirms that the meeting point is derived from the equation 2x = 5 - 2.76.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and pulse propagation
  • Familiarity with tension, mass, and length in physical systems
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of the speed of waves in stretched strings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave speed in stretched strings using different tension and mass configurations
  • Learn about the effects of time delays on wave interactions in various mediums
  • Explore advanced topics in wave interference and pulse behavior in physics
  • Investigate practical applications of wave mechanics in engineering and material science
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, engineers working with wave mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of wave propagation in physical systems.

nick85
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am having difficulty understanding this question:

A wire 5.0 m long and having a mass of 130 g is stretched under a tension of 220 N. If two pulses, separated in time by 30.0 ms, are generated, one at each end of the wire, where will the pulses first meet?

m (distance from the left end of the wire)

From my deduction the each wave starts from the opposite side.
I figured out the v=91.9866 b/c the square root of 220/(.13/5)=91.9866 m/s

I then set up equations
t=time x=distance
91.9866t=x
91.9866(t-3*10^-3)=5-x

I got x to equal 2.6379799 m
However, I am not certain if this is the correct answer and I am down to my last submission. I was wondering if anyone could agree with what I got.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get 1.12m for my answer. Here's my calcs;

[tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\frac{m}{L}}} = \sqrt{\frac{220}{\frac{0.13}{5}}} = 91.9866 m/s[/tex]

[tex]x = vt \Rightarrow t = \frac{x}{v}[/tex]
[tex]5 - x = v(t + 0.03)[/tex]

Subbing [itex]t = \frac{x}{v}[/itex] into [itex]5 - x = v(t + 0.03)[/itex] gives;

[tex]5 - x = v\left( \frac{x}{v} + 0.03 \right) = x + 0.03v[/tex]

[tex]2x = 5 - 0.03v \Rightarrow x = \frac{5 - 0.03\times 91.9866}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\fbox{ x = 1.120201m }[/tex]

I'm not sure that I'm right though :confused:

-Hoot
 
nick85 said:
Hi, I am having difficulty understanding this question:

A wire 5.0 m long and having a mass of 130 g is stretched under a tension of 220 N. If two pulses, separated in time by 30.0 ms, are generated, one at each end of the wire, where will the pulses first meet?

m (distance from the left end of the wire)

From my deduction the each wave starts from the opposite side.
I figured out the v=91.9866 b/c the square root of 220/(.13/5)=91.9866 m/s

I then set up equations
t=time x=distance
91.9866t=x
91.9866(t-3*10^-3)=5-x

I got x to equal 2.6379799 m
However, I am not certain if this is the correct answer and I am down to my last submission. I was wondering if anyone could agree with what I got.

I disagree with your answer and agree with Hootenanny. Your mistake is the sign of the 3*10^-3 in the second line. It should be a plus sign.

Basically (after substitution) you wrote x- 91.99* 3*10^-3 = 5 -x or
2x= 5 + 91.99*3*10^-3 or

2x= 5 + 2.76

But it should be 2x= 5 - 2.76.


(it's easy to see. In the first 30 ms, the first pulse travels 2.76 m. There is still a distance of 5-2.76 to travel for both pulses when the second pulse will be emitted. They will obviously meet halfway through this remaining distance, therefore the answer is x= 1/2(5-2.76).

Patrick
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K