Calculating Flue Gas Losses, Shell Boiler

  • Thread starter Thread starter eddiej90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boiler Gas Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the acceptance testing of a newly installed gas-fired shell boiler, specifically referencing the British Standard "BS EN 12953-11:2003". The user identifies a critical issue with equation (8.5-2) on page 16, where a value of enthalpy is incorrectly subtracted from itself, resulting in zero. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the standard, which has not been revised in a decade and is suspected to contain multiple typographical errors. The user has reached out to the British Standard organization for clarification, but a response is pending due to committee review.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gas-fired shell boiler operations
  • Familiarity with British Standard "BS EN 12953-11:2003"
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and enthalpy calculations
  • Experience with technical documentation and standards review
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the British Standard "BS EN 12953-11:2003" for updates or revisions
  • Investigate common typographical errors in technical standards
  • Learn about acceptance testing procedures for gas-fired boilers
  • Explore thermodynamic principles related to enthalpy and energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, boiler technicians, and quality assurance professionals involved in the installation and testing of gas-fired shell boilers, as well as those interested in the accuracy of technical standards and documentation.

eddiej90
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am currently performing an acceptance test for a newly installed gas fired shell boiler. I am following the British Standard "BS EN 12953-11:2003".

I have encountered a problem with equation (8.5-2) found on page 16 of the document described above. This problem being that a value of enthalpy is subtracted from itself, thus equating it to zero. Surely if this was correct then a value of zero would simply suffice within that section of the equation. The value i decribe is highlighted in the two images attached.

I have contacted the British Standard however it needs to run through a committee before they can produce an answer. Part of me does doubt my thoughts as it published ten years ago and a revised copy has not yet been published. Thought i'd best check with you guys though.
 

Attachments

  • page 1.png
    page 1.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 570
  • page 2.png
    page 2.png
    30.5 KB · Views: 596
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's probably some kind of typo.
 
I've found that this document has many typos. You'd think a british standard that was published ten years ago and has been confirmed wouldn't contain silly little errors like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K