Calculating FM transmission distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter willeverett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fm Transmission
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Calculating the transmission distance for a 2kW FM radio station broadcasting with a 157' antenna requires detailed information beyond basic parameters. Key factors include the type and length of coaxial cable, antenna gain, specific frequency, and receiver sensitivity. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) is determined by the formula: TX power - coax loss + antenna gain. For accurate coverage predictions, tools like Radio Mobile should be utilized to assess received power levels over varying terrain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Effective Radiated Power (ERP) calculations
  • Knowledge of coaxial cable types and their losses
  • Familiarity with antenna gain specifications
  • Basic principles of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to calculate Effective Radiated Power (ERP) for FM transmissions
  • Learn about different coaxial cable types and their associated losses
  • Investigate antenna gain and its impact on broadcast range
  • Explore the use of Radio Mobile for path loss and coverage analysis
USEFUL FOR

Broadcast engineers, radio frequency (RF) specialists, and anyone involved in planning or optimizing FM radio transmission coverage.

willeverett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi -- I am trying to calculate the signal distance for a 2kw FM radio station broadcasting with a 157' antenna over average terrain. The FCC calculator requires field strength, and I don't have a clue what that would be. Can I roughly calculate broadcast distance using the known variables above?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi there,
welcome to PF
No, you need a lot more info :)You said a 157 ft antenna ... I assume you mean that's the mast height ?
You also need to know the cable type and length from transmitter to antenna
you also need to know the gain of the antenna
You also need to state the specific frequency, as the losses of the coax and the gain of the antenna is proportional to the freq used

So TX power - coax loss + antenna gain will give you the Effective Radiated Power, ERP. Some times the EIRP with be the one used = Effective Isotropic Radiated Power.

You also said ... signal distance ... just saying that is pretty meaningless
What you really need to know is how far or what coverage you can get and still have a xxx SNR ( Signal to Noise Ratio). There's no point in saying I have a 100km coverage distance, if at 100km the field strength, in uVolts (microVolts), is below the sensitivity of most receivers

There are pathloss and coverage programs available that will calculate received power levels at a give distance over a given terrain when all of the above info is inputted eg Radio Mobile

cheers
Dave
 
davenn is right but if you don't need a precise calculation, some of the parameters he mentioned can be estimated. What is needed is receiver sensitivity - the minimum signal level you consider acceptable.
The frequency is needed as FM is used for most transmissions over 30 MHz.
How much gain does the antenna have. If you don't have that info, can you describe the antenna?
 
The answer to this question can be as long or as short as you want.
The position and type the receiving antenna is equally important, of course.
For many FM broadcast transmissions, the service is determined by the topography and stations are often sited with local hills. mountains etc providing protection for adjacent service areas. If the query refers to an existing transmitter then you could find out the service area from the spectrum planning authority. If you are planning a broadcast station then you would be best to contact the authority for advice because in many countries (UK in particular) the broadcast network is centrally planned and frequencies are allocated so that the maximum use is made of the available spectrum (co-channel interference is often more significant than just the signal level.)
So, to get a worthwhile answer to this, you'd need to specify much more than your bare facts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
49K