Calculating Force Constant of a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter aishax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
To calculate the force constant of a spring with a 0.256-kg mass stretched by 0.182 m, conservation of energy principles are applied. Initially, all energy is potential when the spring is stretched, and at the equilibrium position, it is entirely kinetic. The kinetic energy at equilibrium is calculated as E = (1/2)mv^2, yielding approximately 0.0712 J. This energy is equal to the potential energy stored in the spring, expressed as E = (1/2)Ks*S^2, leading to the calculation of the spring constant Ks as approximately 4.301 N/m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying energy conservation in spring dynamics.
aishax
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A spring is suspended from a celing and a 0.256-kg mass is attatched to it and pulled down to stretch the spring by 0.182 m. The mass is released and travels through the equilibrium position with a speed of 0.746 m/s. Calculate the force constant on the spring.

I'm not really sure how to tackle this question.
What I ended up trying was looking at the two points being addressed (the point where the spring is stretched 0.182 meters downwards, and the equilibrium).

Using the conservation of energy, I put the equation:

E total1 = E total2

(Where E total1 is at the point where the spring is stretched, and E total2 is the point at which the spring passes the equilibrium)

I then put:

Ep + Ek + Ee = Ep + Ek + Ee

I canceled out Ep ( because h = 0), and Ek (because v = 0) on the left side of the equation. I canceled out Ee on the right side of the equation because x = 0. The equation became:

Ee = Ep +Ek


So far, am I on the right track, or is what I did completely wrong? Could this question be done a simplier way using the formula: Fs = -kx ?

Help is very much appreciated :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
aishax said:
A spring is suspended from a celing and a 0.256-kg mass is attatched to it and pulled down to stretch the spring by 0.182 m. The mass is released and travels through the equilibrium position with a speed of 0.746 m/s. Calculate the force constant on the spring.

I'm not really sure how to tackle this question.
What I ended up trying was looking at the two points being addressed (the point where the spring is stretched 0.182 meters downwards, and the equilibrium).

Using the conservation of energy, I put the equation:

E total1 = E total2

(Where E total1 is at the point where the spring is stretched, and E total2 is the point at which the spring passes the equilibrium)

I then put:

Ep + Ek + Ee = Ep + Ek + Ee

I canceled out Ep ( because h = 0), and Ek (because v = 0) on the left side of the equation. I canceled out Ee on the left
you mean right[/color]side of the equation because x = 0. The equation became:

Ee = Ep +Ek


So far, am I on the right track, or is what I did completely wrong?
it is completely right
Could this question be done a simplier way using the formula: Fs = -kx ?
This would be a much harder way to solve it, with errors guaranteed!
 
At the point where it is stretched fully all the energy is in the form of potential energy. At the equilibrium point all energy in Kinetic.

Let's start at the equilibrium. Energy is all Kinetic so..
E=(1/2)mv^2
E=(1/2)(0.256)0.746^2
E=.0712

Now since that energy is conserved the energy at the equilibrium point should be the same as at the beginning when it is stretched however it is in the form of potential energy. So...

E=(1/2)Ks*S^2
.0712=(1/2)Ks*(.182)^2
Ks=.0712/[(1/2)(.182)^2]
Ks=4.301

Hope I did that all right. If not hopefully it at least helps you out some.
 
Phew, good to know I'm getting somewhere. Thanks PhanthomJay!
And thank you for your input Kreamer! You just forgot to include elastic potential energy :)
 
I had a feeling I was forgetting something. We just learned about all that recently as well so I don't claim to be an expert ;) glad I could help though!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
957
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
725
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K