Calculating Forces and Acceleration in a Castle Bridge Mishap

  • Thread starter Thread starter pegasus24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge sir
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 12K views
pegasus24
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sir Lost-a-Lot dons his armor and sets out from the castle on his trusty steed in his quest to improve communication between damsels and dragons. Unfortunately his squire lowered the draw bridge too far and finally stopped it 20.0° below the horizontal. Lost-a-Lot and his horse stop when their combined center of mass is 1.00 m from the end of the bridge. The uniform bridge is 8.00 m long and has a mass of 1700 kg. The lift cable is attached to the bridge 5.00 m from the hinge at the castle end, and to a point on the castle wall 12.0 m above the bridge. Lost-a-Lot's mass combined with his armor and steed is 1000 kg. Suddenly, the lift cable breaks! The hinge between the castle wall and the bridge is frictionless, and the bridge swings freely until it is vertical.
(a) Find the angular acceleration of the bridge once it starts to move.(rad/s2)
(b) Find the angular speed of the bridge when it strikes the vertical castle wall below the hinge.(rad/s)
(c) Find the force exerted by the hinge on the bridge immediately after the cable breaks.
(d) Find the force exerted by the hinge on the bridge immediately before it strikes the castle wall.


Homework Equations


a) [tex]\tau=I\alpha[/tex]
b) [tex]\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}[/tex]
c) T = 0
d) [tex]\tau[/tex] = r x F


The Attempt at a Solution


I think these are the equations i should use in solving this problem. But I have no clue where to start.
I think [tex]\tau[/tex] can be found using (rFsin[tex]\theta[/tex]) but what about inertia? Could you please giv me a hint to get started on this.. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • p12-21.gif
    p12-21.gif
    13.7 KB · Views: 1,132
on Phys.org
Moment of Inertia of bridge:
Ib = mr^2
but how to calculate moment of inertia for lost-a-lot?
 
hi pegasus24! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)

the moment of inertia of the bridge certainly isn't mr2 :redface:

you need to learn most of the moments of inertia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi tiny-tim.We don't know the structure of bridge-whether it is like a thin rod or it is cylindrical?
How come we find it's moment of inertia then?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi pegasus24! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)

the moment of inertia of the bridge certainly isn't mr2 :redface:

you need to learn most of the moments of inertia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia"


Yes I went through this link. So the
Ib = (m/3)L2
Is this right? Then what about inertia for the person and his horse? How to calculate that? The only way I know is I = (1000g)(L-1)2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When i calculate torque, should I take into account the tension in the cable?
 
[tex]\tau = (1700kg)(9.8m/s<sup>2</sup>)(5m) + (1000kg)(9.8m/s<sup>2</sup>)(7m) = 151900kgm<sup>2</sup>/s<sup>2</sup>[/tex]
[tex]I = I<sub>b</sub> + I<sub>g</sub> = \frac{1}{3}(1700kg)(8m)<sup>2</sup> + (1000kg)(7)<sup>2</sup> = 85266.67kgm<sup>2</sup>[/tex]
[tex]\alpha = \frac{\tau}{I} = 1.78rad/s<sup>2</sup>[/tex]

But this [tex]\alpha[/tex] is wrong.. where did i go wrong?
 
hi pegasus24! :smile:

(you can't use SUP and SUB in tex, you must use ^ and _ :wink:)
pegasus24 said:
\tau = (1700kg)(9.8m/s2)(5m) + (1000kg)(9.8m/s2)(7m) = 151900kgm2/s2
I = Ib + Ig = \frac{1}{3}(1700kg)(8m)2 + (1000kg)(7)2 = 85266.67kgm2
\alpha = \frac{\tau}{I} = 1.78rad/s2

erm … shouldn't that (5m) be (4m) ? :redface:
 
I tried with 4m but it is still wrong..
 
I have already tried that but the answer is too small.. It should be 1. something but when i use this 20 degree angle i get 0.07 something... which is totally wrong..