Calculating Forces in Light Beam Interactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob1182006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Forces Light
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two physics problems from Halliday & Resnick, focusing on force calculations in different contexts. The first problem involves a light beam exerting force on an object, while the second problem deals with forces in a chain of links being lifted with acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the effects of forces acting on the missile and the object in the first problem, questioning the assumptions about the missile's acceleration and the direction of the laser beam.
  • In the second problem, participants discuss the forces acting on each link in the chain, with some attempting to derive forces by working backwards from provided answers, while others express confusion about the application of Newton's second law.
  • There is a debate about whether to add or subtract forces acting on the links, particularly regarding the upward and downward forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, raising questions about their approaches and the assumptions made. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of Newton's laws, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct methods or interpretations yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the first problem due to a lack of knowledge in optics and express uncertainty about the assumptions made in both problems. There is also mention of imposed homework rules that may limit the information available for solving the problems.

bob1182006
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
I have 2 problems I just can't seem to get so I'll post both here instead of making 2 threads.
Both of these are from Halliday & Resnick 5th ed chapter 3 Problems.

Problem #1.
1. Homework Statement

A light beam from a satellite-carried laser strikes an object ejected from an accidentally launched ballistic missile. The beam exerts a force of 2.0 * 10^{-5} N on the target.
If the "dwell time" of the beam on the target is 2.4s by how much is the object displaced if it is
a) a 280-kg warhead
b) a 2.1-kg decoy?

(These displacements can be measured by observing the reflected beam)


Homework Equations


\triangle x=v_0 t +\frac{1}{2}at^2

F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


The missile experiences some uknown horizontal acceleration/velocity so I will just ignore those..
It also experiences a downward acceleration of g.
So does the laser beam?

I need to find the sum of the forces to find the acceleration.
\frac{mg+2.7*10^{-5}}{m} for a I get about 9.8 m/s^2 .
Plugging that into the equation I get a displacement of about 56m but the answer should be some micro-meters..


Problem #9.
1. Homework Statement

A chain consisting of five links, each with mass 100g, is lifted vertically with a constant a =2.5m/s^2.
Find
a) the forces acting between adjacent links
b) the force F exerted on the top link by the agent lifting the chain
c) the net force on each link

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


2.5m/s^2 up
-9.8m/s^2 up

a total of -7.3m/s^2 up

for a.
add up the masses of link+links beneath it and then multiply by 7.3m/s^2 to get a force of:
for the top most link
.5kg*7.3m/s^2 = 3.65 N being exerted on the top link.

Which is completely wrong :/.

for b.
find the total mass and multiply by 7.3m/s^2
F=.5kg*7.3m/s^2=3.65 N
again completely wrong..

for c.
Somehow I got this right...
lowest link force acting upon it is: .1kg*2.5m/s^2 = .25 N
link above it: .2kg*2.5m/s^2=.50 N
...for all others

then subtracting the link force - link below it to get a net force of .25 N on each link.

Any help on either problem is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm mainly trying to get problem #9.

I was working backwards from the answers the book gave.
for a the lowest # and thus the lowest link in the chain I think.

has a total force of 1.23N which requires a force of 12.3 m/s^2 (g+2.5) on a mass of 100g.
Isn't this wrong though? since there's a downward force of .1g N but an upward of .1*2.5 N but somehow the in the book they're adding them...
 
For the first problem, I don't think you should use mg... we don't really know anything about the missile... it may not be accelerating downwards at g (it may have its own thrust or something). we also don't know that the laser is directed straight upwards...
 
For problem 9, part b)

Write this equation out:

\Sigma\vec{F} = ma
 
bob1182006 said:
I'm mainly trying to get problem #9.

I was working backwards from the answers the book gave.
for a the lowest # and thus the lowest link in the chain I think.

has a total force of 1.23N which requires a force of 12.3 m/s^2 (g+2.5) on a mass of 100g.
Isn't this wrong though? since there's a downward force of .1g N but an upward of .1*2.5 N but somehow the in the book they're adding them...
I don't think you are corrrectly applying Newton 2 in your free body diagrams. Isolating the bottom link, there are 2 forces acting on it. You have correctly identified the downward force. The upward force is unknown...call it T. Now use Newton 2nd law...F_net = ma. a is given, don't mess with it.
 
Yea the first problem is weird especially the "These displacements can be measured by observing the reflected beam" o.o since it's barely chapter 3 and I have no knowledge of optics so far.

So sticking to #9.
for part a, there are 2 forces acting on each link, 1 up and 1 down, I add them together right?
so for the lowest link:
.1 kg * 2.5 m/s^2=.25 N
.1 kg * 9.8 m/s^2=.98 N
total being 1.23 N

the second link:
there are 2 links being pulled up so I add the previous link's force + a new link:
1.23 N + (.1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2) = 1.23 N + 1.23 N=2.46

and so forth for the rest correct?

for part b)
I would do almost the same as I did for part a correct? part a I stop adding @ the 4th link since it has force exerted by the 5th which is topmost and the 3rd beneath it.
 
bob1182006 said:
the second link:
there are 2 links being pulled up so I add the previous link's force + a new link:
1.23 N + (.1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2) = 1.23 N + 1.23 N=2.46

Not sure what happened above... : .1kg * 2.5 m/s^2 + .2kg * 9.8 m/s^2 is not 1.23... but 2.46 is the correct answer though.
 
sorry did it first as 2ma+2mg=2.46 N
but split it up into (ma+mg)+(ma+mg)=2.46N

just forgot to change that .2 to a .1.

But I'm still curious, why is it that when I add ma and mg they are both positive? a is pointing up but g is pointing down so shouldn't they be subtracting?...
 
bob1182006 said:
sorry did it first as 2ma+2mg=2.46 N
but split it up into (ma+mg)+(ma+mg)=2.46N

just forgot to change that .2 to a .1.

But I'm still curious, why is it that when I add ma and mg they are both positive? a is pointing up but g is pointing down so shouldn't they be subtracting?...

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a gravityless environment... you only need to exert 1N of force.

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a 9.8m/s^2 gravity environment... you'll need to exert a greater force... you're exerting a force to compensate for gravity.

Fnet = ma
Fupwards - mg = ma
Fupwards = ma + mg

The greater the gravity... the greater the force required to compensate for gravity, and move the object at the same acceleration.
 
  • #10
learningphysics said:
If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a gravityless environment... you only need to exert 1N of force.

If you're lifting 1 kg object upwards at an acceleration 1.0m/s^2 in a 9.8m/s^2 gravity environment... you'll need to exert a greater force... you're exerting a force to compensate for gravity.

Fnet = ma
Fupwards - mg = ma
Fupwards = ma + mg

The greater the gravity... the greater the force required to compensate for gravity, and move the object at the same acceleration.

ok I think I get it now.
so when I find ma for .1kg m the net force IS .1*2.5=.25N but that is the total of the force I want - mg so that's why I add the mg!

Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
925
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K