Calculating g(f(5)) for Composite Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostbuster25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating g(f(5)) for the composite functions f(x) = x² - 3x and g(x) = 8 + 2x - x². The user correctly computes f(5) to be 10 but encounters an issue when evaluating g(10), resulting in -72, which contradicts the domain restriction of g(x) where x must be greater than or equal to 1. The key takeaway is that the domain restriction applies to the input x of g, not the output value of g itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite functions
  • Knowledge of function domain and range
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of function domains and how they affect function outputs
  • Learn about composite functions and their evaluations
  • Explore quadratic function properties and their graphs
  • Practice problems involving function composition and domain restrictions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of composite functions and domain restrictions.

ghostbuster25
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
Im looking for g(f(5))

where f(x) = X^2 - 3x

and g(x) = 8 + 2x - x^2 xER and x is greater than or equal to 1

I have first found f(5)
(5)^2-3(5)
which equals 10

However when i do g(10)
8+2(10)-(10)^2

that gives me a negative number of -72! Which can't be right because g has to greater than or equal to 1

Where am i going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. What you said was that x has to be \geq 1, not g. There is a difference - can you tell me what the difference is?
 
cyby said:
No. What you said was that x has to be \geq 1, not g. There is a difference - can you tell me what the difference is?


is it because g is a gunction of x, not x itself!? am i doing it correctly then? :)
 
The difference is that you're limiting the *domain* of g to be positive. This said nothing about the function must evaluate to.

What this is essentially saying is that g(1) is ok, but g(0.5) isn't, because 0.5 is < 1.

Everything else looks good.
 
ahhh yer that makes sense :) thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K