Calculating heat output from current

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating heat output from electrical current, emphasizing that heat generation depends solely on current, not voltage. To determine heat output, one must know the resistance, which can be calculated from the dimensions of the resistor. The conversation also touches on combined heat and power systems, highlighting the benefits of generating electricity on-site to minimize energy loss due to voltage drop. High-voltage transmission reduces current, thereby decreasing heat dissipation and the amount of copper needed for conductors. The efficiency of these systems is linked to thermodynamic cycles, where waste heat can be repurposed for heating, benefiting both energy efficiency and the environment.
timsea81
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
This is actually a heat transfer question but what I don't understand is the electrical part of it.

Given the current (in amps) and the resistivity (in ohm x seconds), how do I figure out how much heat is being generated? I would think you would need to know the voltage as well, but it is not given.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don't need to know the voltage but you do need to know the dimensions of the resistor so that you can work out the resistance.

Once you do know the resistance, Power = I 2 * R
 
I found the formula for this but was still having trouble grasping it conceptually, but I just realized something.

A few weeks ago I was talking to some mechanical and electrical engineers about combined heat and power. Combined heat and power, aka co-generation or co-gen, is generating electricity on site, usually by burning natural gas, and using the waste heat to heat your buildings, domestic hot water, or some other process.

All of the mechanical guys were saying what a great system it is, and amongst our reasons for this is minimizing voltage drop by generating electricity on site. The electrical guy disagreed, saying that voltage drop is negligible and the grid system is not flawed (although the generation systems certainly are).

Now I realize that the part that I wasn't understanding about the inefficiencies of the grid and the part I was not understanding about this problem are one in the same. The heat generated by electrical current, which represents the energy wasted through voltage drop, depends on current only, not voltage. So when power is transmitted at high voltage, since the current is therefore low, so is the heat dissipation, and so is the wasted energy.

Say you needed to transmit 100,000 VA from point A to point B. If you were to transmit it at 100V, the energy wasted through heat dissipation would be proportional to the 1,000A current. If you were to step up the voltage to 100,000V, the current would only be 1A and the wasted energy would be proportional to 1A. Because heat generation depends on current ONLY, not voltage.
 
Transmission guys design for the loss they want to tolerate,
let's just say they can afford to lose 3% of the power along a line.
Power is volts times amps.

At high voltage the current is small so you can use small conductors and get 3% voltage drop. In your example you could tolerate 3kv drop at 1 amp, 3000 ohms.

At low voltage the current is high so you need large conductors to get 3% voltage drop.
In your example that would be 3 volts at 1000 amps which is 0.003 ohms.

Resistance of wire is in proportion to 1/(its area) and area X length is volume of copper required to make the wire...
So for a given line length, 3000/.003 = 1,000,000
A thousandfold increase in voltage yields a millionfold decrease in copper required?
somebody please check my arithmetic and logic...i haven't had my coffee yet.

Textbooks say it's mostly the cost of those huge conductors and the impracticality of towers to support them that makes high voltage economical. Longer insulators are cheap in comparison.
#10 wire is quite close to one milli-ohm per foot. It's about diameter of a soda straw.
To get .003 ohms per thousand feet would be something like three hundred strands of #10, fifteen hundred strands to get .003 ohms per mile..
but a single strand of it is only 5.2 ohms per mile, more than adequate for your high voltage transmission.
I think your example drives home what the textbooks say, but again sanity checks are welcome.


Your mechanical friends are doubtless looking at the thermodynamic cycle.
Exhaust steam from a turbine is condensed into water so you can pump it back into the boiler, and the heat of vaporization is lost. That amounts to ~1000 BTU/pound which is quite a lot.
If you can loan that exhaust steam to a nearby bulding where they can condense it to warm themselves then pump it back to you condensed into water, everybody wins including the environment.



old jim
 
Last edited:
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K