Calculating Initial Velocity of a Falling Object: A Troubleshooting Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the initial velocity of a second stone thrown from a bridge after the first stone is dropped. The scenario includes two stones, one dropped from a height of 44 meters and the other thrown 1 second later, both striking the water simultaneously.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations to determine the time of fall and initial velocity. There are attempts to plot graphs and analyze the results, leading to confusion about the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants are questioning the correctness of the equations used and the units involved, while others are clarifying the proper form of the equations. There is acknowledgment of a misunderstanding regarding the time variable in the equations.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of kinematic equations and the implications of initial conditions, as well as the need for clarity on the units of measurement in the equations being discussed.

emyt
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a stone is dropped into th water fro a bridge 44 m above the water. another stone is thrown vertically 1.0s after the first is dropped. Both stones strike the water at the same time. What is the initial speed of the second stone?

Homework Equations



x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t)
vx = vxo + axt
x = x0 + 1/2(vx+vx0)(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



it seemed like a pretty simple question, I calculated how long it took for a stone to go from 44 m above the water to 0 m in free fall ( 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) ) then I subtracted 1 second from that time and plugged it into 0 = 44 + vx(8) - 4.9(8) to see the initial velocity of the second stone..

then something strange happened.. I tried to plot a speed v.s. time graph and so I wanted to find the velocity of the stone at a point in time.. so I plugged vx = -4.9(9) and I get some pretty big number.. -88.. then I tried plugging it into x = 1/2(-88)(9) and I get a humongous number.. what's going on?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:
 
semc said:
Hi, firstly your equation is wrong x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2 ax(t). You see a.t will give you the unit of m/s however v.t gives you m which is distance so how can you add speed with distance? Secondly x0 is the initial displacement from a point a reference and x is your final displacement. Try again and i believe your approach is correct :biggrin:

I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0mthanks
 
emyt said:
I'm not sure :S, that equation should work shouldn't it? I've used it before.. Also, my x0 is 44 because I'm taking that as the initial distance and so my acceleration is negative because it will go from 44m to 0m

Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :-p however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2
 
semc said:
Yeap you are correct in the displacement part :-p however as i mentioned if you were to look at the equation you wrote, the units on the left and right won't add up do they? I believe the equation is x = x0 + vt + 0.5at^2

the equation is x = x0 + vx0t (initial velocity) + 0.5at^2 and it should work, as it comes from x = x0 + 1/2(v + vx0 )t which is just the addition of distances..

thanks
 
can someone help please..
 
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)
 
semc said:
What seem to be your problem? 0 = 44 - 4.9(t) should be 0 = 44 - 4.9(t2)


AH right.. I forgot that it was at^2

thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K