Calculating Joules from Watts: 4000 Watts for 30 Seconds

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter math111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joules Seconds Watts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between power (measured in watts) and energy (measured in joules) in the context of heating stainless steel (S/S) using a specific power input. Participants explore the implications of inputting 4000 watts for a duration of time and how this affects the temperature of the material, considering factors such as energy transfer, thermal equilibrium, and the physical properties of the material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants calculate that 4000 watts for 30 seconds results in 120,000 joules, correcting earlier miscalculations.
  • One participant draws an analogy between power and energy, suggesting that the derivative of energy with respect to time equals power.
  • Another participant questions how energy input affects the temperature of stainless steel, raising concerns about the melting point and the assumptions made regarding energy transfer.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of thermal equilibrium, suggesting that if a material cannot dissipate heat, its temperature will continue to rise indefinitely with constant power input.
  • Others highlight the importance of thermal radiation and conduction in determining the maximum temperature of the material when heated.
  • One participant mentions the increase in electrical resistance of the material as it heats up, which may affect energy input calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the need for additional information, such as the surface area and emissivity of the stainless steel, to accurately determine the maximum temperature it can reach under a given power input.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on how energy input translates to temperature rise, with some agreeing on the basic principles of energy transfer while others raise questions about specific conditions and assumptions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact relationship between power input and temperature rise in the context of the stainless steel heating scenario.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the physical properties of the stainless steel, the method of energy input, and the assumptions regarding heat dissipation mechanisms. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps needed to calculate maximum temperature based on power input.

math111
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
1 Watt = 1 Joule/Second

So does that mean if I input 4000 watts for 30 seconds that will output 12000 Joules?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Almost. 120,000 J.
 
mrmiller1 said:
Almost. 120,000 J.

Yeah I missed the extra 0! so you're value is right along with my concept

Thanks...
 
Yeah, I was just messing.
So in general power (P) is similar to energy (E) the same way velocity (V) is similar to displacement (x). The derivative of energy with respect to time is equal to power.
dE/dt = P vs. dx/dt = Vx
 
mrmiller1 said:
Yeah, I was just messing.
So in general power (P) is similar to energy (E) the same way velocity (V) is similar to displacement (x). The derivative of energy with respect to time is equal to power.
dE/dt = P vs. dx/dt = Vx

I want to take this a little further and see if you see what I do...

(1)http://www.nexthermal.com/page/resource-center/wattage-formulas.aspx

Where it has the formula for KW to heat up a material on top(1). I want to heat up S/S 304.

(2)http://www.aksteel.com/pdf/markets_products/stainless/austenitic/304_304L_Data_Sheet.pdf

I use their constants...Density=.29, Specific Heat=.12

My point:
I have an Electrical Engineering who used a 4.0 KW/208V input for S/S material for an entire weekend and it did not melt. The melting temperature of S/S is 2550F - 2650F and with the formula if we used the 4KW input for only 24 hours it would of reached almost 10,000 F and that would mean the S/S would of 100% melted, right?

Conclusion that I am questioned about:

1 W = 1 J/S from above so if I input this into a material for 1 second it will be 1 J and if I input it for 10 Seconds it will be 10 J so the more time I input Watts the more hot it will get(I am assuming!) but at what point does it level off and why because if it does not won't the material in the formula go right to infinity with time unless joules & watts has no relation to heating the material?

:confused:
 
First, how energy translates to temperature depends upon the material and exactly how you are "inputting" the energy. If the tempearture does, in fact, increase as you keep adding the energy, the material will eventually melt.
 
HallsofIvy said:
First, how energy translates to temperature depends upon the material and exactly how you are "inputting" the energy. If the tempearture does, in fact, increase as you keep adding the energy, the material will eventually melt.

Inputting the energy: a bolt is connected to the material and a wire is connected to the bolt from a power source of 208V. When plugged in does energy keep being added over time or is this constant? This might help me understand it more because all I know is...

1. More time = more energy = higher temperature to infinifnty
or
2. This energy input is constant and will increase the temperature of the S/S up to a certain temp and hold it. If so how do I find that temp where 4.0 KW = ?
 
math111 said:
Inputting the energy: a bolt is connected to the material and a wire is connected to the bolt from a power source of 208V. When plugged in does energy keep being added over time or is this constant? This might help me understand it more because all I know is...

1. More time = more energy = higher temperature to infinifnty
or
2. This energy input is constant and will increase the temperature of the S/S up to a certain temp and hold it. If so how do I find that temp where 4.0 KW = ?

If something is unable to cool itself by radiating or conducting away energy then yes it will continue to heat up as long as you supply power. Your stainless steel sheet however can obviously radiate away excess energy once it's sufficiently hot.

If your steel didn't melt then you probably underestimated the amount of heat that it was able to radiate or conduct away, something which is a function of how you're physically holding the steel, what it's in contact with and even it's spatial orientation.

You also may have not accounted for the increase in electrical resistance of the material as it's heated.
 
uart said:
If something is unable to cool itself by radiating or conducting away energy then yes it will continue to heat up as long as you supply power. Your stainless steel sheet however can obviously radiate away excess energy once it's sufficiently hot.

So when the material's temperature is rising the mode of radiation is ocurring which is a reason why the temperature is leveling off??

Can anyone relate the amount of KW input to the temperature rise? Like if I input 4Kw what will the temp of the material be at or am I missing information to help answer this like a size needed or how long am I inputting the power...
 
  • #10
math111 said:
Inputting the energy: a bolt is connected to the material and a wire is connected to the bolt from a power source of 208V. When plugged in does energy keep being added over time or is this constant? This might help me understand it more because all I know is...

1. More time = more energy = higher temperature to infinifnty
or
2. This energy input is constant and will increase the temperature of the S/S up to a certain temp and hold it. If so how do I find that temp where 4.0 KW = ?

uart beat me to the answer, and he is correct.
Let me give another example for you to consider...an incandescent light bulb has a filament inside that will reach a temperature of close to 5,000 F degrees, it does not melt, nor does the glass around it.
It is a matter of thermal discharge rate.

Ron
 
  • #11
RonL said:
uart beat me to the answer, and he is correct.
Let me give another example for you to consider...an incandescent light bulb has a filament inside that will reach a temperature of close to 5,000 F degrees, it does not melt, nor does the glass around it.
It is a matter of thermal discharge rate.

Ron

OK so as the temperature is rising due to the Kw input over time I have to figure out the radition rate of temperature given off to find this level temperature...
 
  • #12
Is it possible to find out how much heat/temperature is given off while s/s is being heated via 4Kw. Would that be considered the finding the natural convection of s/s??
 
  • #13
math111 said:
Is it possible to find out how much heat/temperature is given off while s/s is being heated via 4Kw. Would that be considered the finding the natural convection of s/s??

If the steel is at its maximum temperature with the power on, then it is at thermodynamic equilibrium which means that power in = power out. If the beam is supported in such a way to minimize conduction and convection than power in ~= radiation out.

If you want to calculate what the maximum temperature of the steel would be given your input power, you need to know its surface area and emissivity. Some helpful info here: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/radiation-heat-transfer-d_431.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K