Calculating Ksp of Ag2CrO4 from Experimental Data

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the solubility product constant (Ksp) of silver chromate (Ag2CrO4) using experimental data. The experiment involved placing 1.25g of copper in a 1.00 L solution of silver chromate, resulting in a weight of 1.24g after extraction. The calculated Ksp value of 1.56 * 10^-11 was found to be significantly higher than the known value of 1.1 * 10^-12, leading to confusion about the methodology. Participants expressed skepticism about the experiment's design, particularly regarding the expected weight of copper after the reaction. The discussion highlights concerns over the accuracy of the experimental results and the validity of the question posed.
Seinfeld4
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

I need to calculate the Ksp of Ag2CrO4 based on experimental data.

During the experiment, 1.25g of pure copper was placed in a 1.00 L solution of silver chromate. When the copper was extracted, only 1.24g remained.
Balanced chemical equation: Cu + Ag2CrO4 --> CuCrO4 + 2Ag

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I did:

mole of copper = 0.01g / 63.546
= 1.57 * 10^-4

Since volume is 1.00 L, the number of moles is equal to the concentration.
There are 2 moles of Ag and 1 mole of CrO4 for every mole of copper, so:

Ksp = (1.57 * 10^-4) (3.15 * 10^-4) (3.15 * 10^-4)
= 1.56 * 10^-11

But this doesn't seem correct because the actual value is 1.1 * 10^-12.
This would give me a percentage error of over 1000%...

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach looks correct and the answer seems to be consistent with the data given.

I don't like this question. I wonder how they extracted the copper. Solid left after reaction completed should weigh more, not less.
 
Ok, I thought I was doing it properly. I'm not sure why they made a question that produced a % error greater than 1000. Anyways, thanks Borek!
 
I'm currently working on this same question, lol, can you tell me if the answer to this question was marked correctly? I got the same answers with the same approach.. I know this thread is a year old ._.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top