Physical law from experimental data

In summary, experiments provide data that can be used to determine the relationship between proper time intervals and coordinate time intervals for varying relative velocities. An intelligent computer program could potentially find the time dilation formula using this data, but further experiments may also be necessary. Similarly, in the case of mass dilation, Bucherer's experiment provides data that, along with the law of inertia and the uniformity of clock rates, can be used to derive Lorentz invariance and other consequences of relativity. The law of inertia helps determine the world lines in inertial reference frames and can be used to deduce the light-signal coordinates of an event in a frame moving with a certain velocity. This ultimately leads to the formula for Lorentz invar
  • #1
bernhard.rothenstein
991
1
Consider that high quality experiments furnish data that relate proper time intervals to coordinate time intervals for different values of the relative velocity (life time dilationf moving mesons). An inteligent computer program could find out the best function of the relative speed which relates all the experimental results, i.e. the time dilation formula. Could we use it for further relativistic derivations or it is necessary to perform other experiments (light clock) in order to derive it?
We find a simillar situation in the case of the formula which accounts for the mass dilation (Bucherer's experiment).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
With that experimental data, together with the law of inertia and the uniformity of clock rates on any single world line, one can deduce Lorentz invariance, and all other consequences of relativity.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
dx said:
With that experimental data, together with the law of inertia and the uniformity of clock rates on any single world line, one can deduce Lorentz invariance, and all other consequences of relativity.

Thanks. Please be more specific concerning the law of inertia. What does it introduce in the derivation?
 
  • #4
The law of inertia is just to determine what world lines look like in inertial reference frames. If we send particles with different velocities in different directions, and then record the event where their measure a time 1, we get the hyperbola. In light-signal coordinates, this hyperbola is [tex] \tau_1 \tau_2 = 1 [/tex]. By a simple argument, we can deduce that the light-signal coordinates of an event [tex] (\tau_1, \tau_2) [/tex] in a frame moving with velocity v relative to the original frame are

[tex] \tau_1 ' = \sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}} \tau_1 [/tex]
[tex] \tau_2 ' = \sqrt{\frac{1-v}{1+v}} \tau_2 [/tex]

Thus we get lorentz invariance: [tex] \tau_1 \tau_2 = \tau_1 ' \tau_2 ' [/tex].
 

1. What is the definition of a physical law?

A physical law is a statement that describes a fundamental principle or relationship in nature that has been repeatedly observed and tested through experiments and observations.

2. How are physical laws derived from experimental data?

Physical laws are derived from experimental data through a process called the scientific method. This involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, and analyzing the results to form a conclusion. If the results consistently support the hypothesis, it can be considered a physical law.

3. Can physical laws change over time?

Physical laws are considered to be constant and unchanging. However, as new experimental data and technologies become available, our understanding of these laws may evolve and improve.

4. Are physical laws absolute or are there exceptions?

Physical laws are generally considered to be absolute, meaning they apply universally and without exception. However, there may be rare cases where certain conditions or factors can cause a physical law to appear to be violated. In these cases, it is usually a result of a lack of complete understanding or knowledge of the system.

5. How do physical laws differ from theories?

Physical laws and theories are closely related, but there are some key differences. A physical law is a statement that describes a fundamental principle or relationship in nature, while a theory is a well-tested explanation for a wide range of phenomena. Physical laws are generally more specific and limited in scope compared to theories.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
837
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
663
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
83
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top