Calculating KWH Generated by a Water Turbine?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arranged
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wattage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the kilowatt-hours (KWH) generated by a water turbine based on the volume of water falling through a pipe. Key formulas include calculating velocity using the equation (2 x H x G) ^ 0.5 and determining energy using gravitational potential energy. The correct approach to convert wattage to KWH involves using the formula Energy (in Watt-hours) = power (in Watts) * time (in hours). The conversation highlights common misconceptions regarding power and energy calculations, emphasizing the importance of understanding the difference between kinetic energy and power.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts such as power and energy
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics, specifically volumetric flow rate
  • Ability to perform unit conversions between watts and kilowatt-hours
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "hydro power calculator" for practical applications and detailed calculations
  • Study the principles of fluid dynamics to improve volumetric flow rate calculations
  • Learn about energy conversion and efficiency in hydroelectric systems
  • Explore online resources on gravitational potential energy and its applications in energy generation
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physics students, and hobbyists interested in renewable energy generation, particularly those focusing on hydroelectric power systems.

arranged
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm attempting to calculate the amount of power (in KWH) produced by a water turbine based on x litres of water falling x metres vertically through a tube of x cm diameter

So far I've managed the following:
H = height (distance fallen) (m)
Time = Secs
R = Radius of the pipe (m)

Velocity (m/s) = (2 x H x G) ^ 0.5
Volume / Sec = Velocity x Time x Pi x R^2
mass (kg) / Sec = (Volume / sec) x 1000
Energy = (Mass x Velocity^2)/2 = wattage generated

My questions is... how do i convert this wattage generated in KWH generated?


Once I have this am i correct in thinking I can do:
(KWH generated / 3600) * (time taken for x litres of water to fall through the pipe).
To calculate the KWH generated by the x litres of water falling?

Any help / guidance anyone could give me would be greatly appreciated. - As you can (maybe) tell I'm by no means a physics graduate but i do have a basic understanding.

Any help anyone could give me would be greatly appreciated.

Many Thanks

P.s For the purposes of this I'm happy to work with a turbine having 100% efficiency.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Power isn't measured in kWh; that's a unit of energy.

Energy (in Watt-hours) = power (in Watts) * time (in hours).

So, if your turbine produces 100kW (power) constantly for 3 hours (time), you will have produced 300kWh of energy.

The short way of finding out the amount of energy available in your example would just be to use:

Gravitational potential energy = (mass of water)*(vertical distance travelled)*g

Ok?
 
thats a good point, i never thought of working it out with PE, that would have made it much simpler.

Thanks for your comments they are extremely useful.

Did u happen to look at my wattage calculation? I'm fairly confident it's correct but would be useful if someone could confirm it.

Thanks again for your help.
 
Well your 'wattage calculation' is wrong, because (mass*velocity^2)/2 equals kinetic energy, not power.

Power is the rate of consumption/production of energy:

Power = energy / time


Also, your volumetric flow rate calculation is incorrect. Volumetric flow rate equals flow velocity multiplied by the cross-sectional area of the pipe. I don't know why you've multiplied this by time. Then, mass flow rate is just volume flow rate multiplied by density; in this instance it's water so 1 litre per second is one kilogram per second.
 
arranged-

Do a search for "hydro power calculator". You'll find many online and several will go into the details...frictional losses, head pressure, etc...some theoretical and some real-world.

There's loooooots of info out there online and sometimes the hardest part of finding it is the phrasing of the search term.

Toymkr
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
17K
Replies
13
Views
5K