Calculating lattice enthelpy of FeF2

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiturtle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the lattice enthalpy of FeF2 using the lattice enthalpy of FeCl2 and the ionic radii of Cl- and F-. The initial approach involved using a proportionality equation based on the charges and distances of the ions, but this was deemed incorrect due to the nature of the proportionality. The Kapustinskii equation was then attempted to find the radius of iron, but challenges arose in isolating the distance between nuclei. Participants noted that the problem could be simplified to a quadratic equation, suggesting basic algebra techniques for resolution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying theoretical concepts to solve the problem.
hiturtle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Calculate the lattice enthalpy of FeF2 using the following data:
Hlatt (FeCl2) = 2569 kJ/mol
r(Cl-) = 181 pm
r(F-) = 133 pm

I started with Hlatt is proportional to [absolute value of the product of charge on cation and anion] divided by the distance between their nuclei. Since the charge on F and Cl are the same, you could equate 2 proportionality equations to get Hlatt FeCl2/Hlatt FeF2 = 133 pm / 181 pm. I realized that this wouldn't work because the proportionality is for the distance between nuclei, not the radius of the anion.

So I tried to use the Kapustinskii equation, thinking that I could find the radius of iron. This didn't turn out well because I don't know how to isolate the distance between nucleus.

My prof said that this is an easy question and you're not allowed to use any other data (ex. enthalpy of sublimation, ionization, etc).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hiturtle said:
So I tried to use the Kapustinskii equation, thinking that I could find the radius of iron. This didn't turn out well because I don't know how to isolate the distance between nucleus.

That's a correct approach - and to be honest, I have no idea where the problem is. Looks to me like just a quadratic equation (after rearranging). Complete the square or start with discriminant - that's a basic HS algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K