Calculating lattice enthelpy of FeF2

  • Thread starter Thread starter hiturtle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lattice
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the lattice enthalpy of FeF2 using the lattice enthalpy of FeCl2 and the ionic radii of Cl- and F-. The initial approach involved using the proportionality of lattice enthalpy to the product of ionic charges divided by the distance between nuclei, but this was deemed incorrect due to the reliance on ionic radii rather than actual distances. The Kapustinskii equation was suggested as a method to find the necessary parameters, but the user struggled with isolating the distance between nuclei. The conversation emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation in solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of lattice enthalpy concepts
  • Familiarity with ionic radii and their significance
  • Knowledge of the Kapustinskii equation
  • Basic algebra skills for solving quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Kapustinskii equation in detail
  • Learn how to calculate ionic distances between nuclei
  • Explore the concept of lattice enthalpy in different ionic compounds
  • Practice solving quadratic equations and their applications in chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, materials scientists, and anyone interested in thermodynamic properties of ionic compounds.

hiturtle
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Calculate the lattice enthalpy of FeF2 using the following data:
Hlatt (FeCl2) = 2569 kJ/mol
r(Cl-) = 181 pm
r(F-) = 133 pm

I started with Hlatt is proportional to [absolute value of the product of charge on cation and anion] divided by the distance between their nuclei. Since the charge on F and Cl are the same, you could equate 2 proportionality equations to get Hlatt FeCl2/Hlatt FeF2 = 133 pm / 181 pm. I realized that this wouldn't work because the proportionality is for the distance between nuclei, not the radius of the anion.

So I tried to use the Kapustinskii equation, thinking that I could find the radius of iron. This didn't turn out well because I don't know how to isolate the distance between nucleus.

My prof said that this is an easy question and you're not allowed to use any other data (ex. enthalpy of sublimation, ionization, etc).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hiturtle said:
So I tried to use the Kapustinskii equation, thinking that I could find the radius of iron. This didn't turn out well because I don't know how to isolate the distance between nucleus.

That's a correct approach - and to be honest, I have no idea where the problem is. Looks to me like just a quadratic equation (after rearranging). Complete the square or start with discriminant - that's a basic HS algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
19K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K