Calculating Limits of Functions in R^2 or Higher Dimensions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on calculating limits of functions defined in R² or higher dimensions, specifically exploring the limit of the function sqrt{hk/(h²+k²)} as (h,k) approaches (0,0). Participants consider various approaches, including the use of polar coordinates and the implications of directional dependence on the limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the limit of sqrt{hk/(h²+k²)} as (h,k) approaches (0,0) might be 1/sqrt(2) if h=k, but expresses uncertainty about this approach.
  • Another participant proposes using polar coordinates to analyze the limit, indicating that if the limit does not depend on the angle θ, it may be well-defined.
  • It is noted that simply fixing θ and then taking the limit as r approaches 0 is insufficient; θ must remain free for the limit to be considered independent of direction.
  • A participant calculates that using polar coordinates leads to a limit that depends on θ, raising concerns about the limit's well-defined nature.
  • One participant explains that limits in R² must yield the same result regardless of the path taken to approach the limit point, providing examples of different limits along various paths.
  • It is concluded that since different limits are obtained when approaching (0,0) along different lines, the limit does not exist.
  • Another participant emphasizes that if the limit does exist, it must be shown to be independent of θ when using polar coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity for limits to be independent of the direction of approach. However, there is disagreement on the specific limit of the function in question, with some proposing different values based on the path taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering multiple paths when evaluating limits in R², and the discussion reflects various assumptions about the behavior of the function near the limit point.

Andy_ToK
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm sort of new to the calculation of limits of functions defined in R^2( or R^n, n>=2)
exp. the limit of sqrt{hk/(h^2+k^2)} as (h,k) --> (0,0)
I think it should be 1/sqrt(2) if we let h=k. but I'm not sure if this is the right approach.
what about other limits in the form "0/0" as x={x1,x2...xn}-->0 (x is an element of R^n)?
just make x1=x2=...=xn?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if you use polar coordinates?
 
Limits require the idea of distance. Well defined limits are those for which the answer is the same regardless of the direction of approach. In \mathbb{R}^n there's the usual distance function as the sqrt of the sum of squares (also known as the 2-norm). So following AiRAVATA's suggestion, let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta and take the limit r->0. If this doesn't depend on theta, then you've got a well defined limit.
 
genneth said:
let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta and take the limit r->0. If this doesn't depend on theta, then you've got a well defined limit.

A little comment on this. It is not sufficent to first fix theta, then take limit r->0, and be happy if the result was independent of theta.
 
jostpuur said:
A little comment on this. It is not sufficent to first fix theta, then take limit r->0, and be happy if the result was independent of theta.

Indeed -- I meant that theta must be left free, and the limit must be found to be independent of theta. Sorry if I was unclear.
 
Thanks.
well, if let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta, lim_{(h,k)->(0,0)} \sqrt{\frac{hk}{h^2+k^2}}} can be simplified to lim_{r->0}\sqrt{\cos \theta\sin \theta} which is dependent on theta however, how should I proceed then?
 
Then you have a problem. The limit is not well defined.
 
The problem is that limits in R2 must give the same thing when the limit point (here (0,0)) is approached along any path. Most Calculus texts give examples (often in the exercises) of functions that have the same limit as (0,0) is approached along any straight line, but a different limit approaching (0,0) along a parabola.

In this case, it is simplest to do it the opposite way:
\frac{hk}{h^2+ k^2}
if h= k, becomes
\frac{h^2}{2h^2}= 1/2
for all h and so has limit, as (0,0) is approached along the line h= k, of 1/2.
However, if we take h= 0, it becomes
\frac{k*0}{k^2}= 0
for all k and so has limit, as (0,0) is approached along the line h=0, of 0.

Since those two limits are different, the limit itself does not exist.

If the limit does not exist, it is sufficient to show that limits along two different curves are different.

Of course, if the limit does exist, then showing that you get the same thing along any number of curves is not sufficient. Usually, then, the simplest way to find the limit is to do as was originally suggested: convert to polar coordinates so that the distance from the origin depends on the single variable r. If the limit as r goes to 0 is independent of \theta then that value is the limit of the function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you. HallsofIvy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K