Calculating Limits of Functions in R^2 or Higher Dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating limits of functions defined in R^2 or higher dimensions, specifically the limit of sqrt{hk/(h^2+k^2)} as (h,k) approaches (0,0). The limit is shown to be dependent on the path taken, with different results when approaching along the line h=k (yielding 1/2) versus h=0 (yielding 0), indicating that the limit does not exist. The use of polar coordinates is emphasized as a method to determine well-defined limits by ensuring independence from the angle theta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates in R^2
  • Knowledge of the 2-norm distance function
  • Ability to analyze limits along different paths
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limits in R^n, focusing on path dependence
  • Learn how to convert Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates in R^2
  • Explore examples of functions with limits that depend on the approach path
  • Investigate the epsilon-delta definition of limits in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and multivariable analysis, as well as educators seeking to explain the concept of limits in higher dimensions.

Andy_ToK
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm sort of new to the calculation of limits of functions defined in R^2( or R^n, n>=2)
exp. the limit of sqrt{hk/(h^2+k^2)} as (h,k) --> (0,0)
I think it should be 1/sqrt(2) if we let h=k. but I'm not sure if this is the right approach.
what about other limits in the form "0/0" as x={x1,x2...xn}-->0 (x is an element of R^n)?
just make x1=x2=...=xn?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if you use polar coordinates?
 
Limits require the idea of distance. Well defined limits are those for which the answer is the same regardless of the direction of approach. In \mathbb{R}^n there's the usual distance function as the sqrt of the sum of squares (also known as the 2-norm). So following AiRAVATA's suggestion, let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta and take the limit r->0. If this doesn't depend on theta, then you've got a well defined limit.
 
genneth said:
let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta and take the limit r->0. If this doesn't depend on theta, then you've got a well defined limit.

A little comment on this. It is not sufficent to first fix theta, then take limit r->0, and be happy if the result was independent of theta.
 
jostpuur said:
A little comment on this. It is not sufficent to first fix theta, then take limit r->0, and be happy if the result was independent of theta.

Indeed -- I meant that theta must be left free, and the limit must be found to be independent of theta. Sorry if I was unclear.
 
Thanks.
well, if let h=r \cos \theta, k = r \sin \theta, lim_{(h,k)->(0,0)} \sqrt{\frac{hk}{h^2+k^2}}} can be simplified to lim_{r->0}\sqrt{\cos \theta\sin \theta} which is dependent on theta however, how should I proceed then?
 
Then you have a problem. The limit is not well defined.
 
The problem is that limits in R2 must give the same thing when the limit point (here (0,0)) is approached along any path. Most Calculus texts give examples (often in the exercises) of functions that have the same limit as (0,0) is approached along any straight line, but a different limit approaching (0,0) along a parabola.

In this case, it is simplest to do it the opposite way:
\frac{hk}{h^2+ k^2}
if h= k, becomes
\frac{h^2}{2h^2}= 1/2
for all h and so has limit, as (0,0) is approached along the line h= k, of 1/2.
However, if we take h= 0, it becomes
\frac{k*0}{k^2}= 0
for all k and so has limit, as (0,0) is approached along the line h=0, of 0.

Since those two limits are different, the limit itself does not exist.

If the limit does not exist, it is sufficient to show that limits along two different curves are different.

Of course, if the limit does exist, then showing that you get the same thing along any number of curves is not sufficient. Usually, then, the simplest way to find the limit is to do as was originally suggested: convert to polar coordinates so that the distance from the origin depends on the single variable r. If the limit as r goes to 0 is independent of \theta then that value is the limit of the function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you. HallsofIvy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K