Sirsh
- 262
- 10
Oops. there is an identical question to this, forgot different Velocity. so we would substitute 200ms into it instead of (800/3.6) so we'd end up getting.. ~1020m :)
Now you've got it!Sirsh said:Oops. there is an identical question to this, forgot different Velocity. so we would substitute 200ms into it instead of (800/3.6) so we'd end up getting.. ~1020m :)
