Calculating Magnetic Field Between Parallel Wires

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnetic field at point P due to two parallel wires carrying currents in opposite directions, the Biot-Savart Law should be used for small wire segments. The distance r should be calculated correctly, considering the geometry of the setup, specifically using the Pythagorean theorem for the segments' distances. If the wires were long enough, Ampere's Law could be applicable instead. The discussion highlights confusion over the correct equations and the interpretation of the problem's requirements. Correctly identifying the parameters and equations is crucial for solving the magnetic field calculation.
viperassasin
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two parallel wires are 5.60 cm apart and carry currents in opposite directions, as shown in the figure.

Find the magnitude of the magnetic field at point P due to two 1.50-\,{\rm mm} segments of wire that are opposite each other and each 8.00 {\rm cm} from P.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what to us for r or I'm using the wrong equation

but i used muenot Itop/(2pi r) + muenot I bottom/(2pi r) where r was the sqrt(8^2 +8^2)


 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should use the Biot-Savart Law.
 
Find the magnitude of the magnetic field at point P due to two 1.50-\,{\rm mm} segments of wire that are opposite each other and each 8.00 {\rm cm} from P.

Can you rephrase that line so it is readable? I don't know what they are asking now...

If they're asking the magnetic field for only small segments of the wire than yes, use Biot-Savart.

If they're asking the magnetic field for large segments of the wire (nearing infinite in relation to the other distances) then you can probably use Ampere's law ( int B * dl = ...)
 
got it

I can't post pics yet. but i got it anyway I was using the wrong thing for r on each magnetic field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top