Calculating Magnitude Difference: Is it Right?

Click For Summary
The calculated magnitude difference of -0.073 using the formula -2.5log(11347/10606) raises questions about its accuracy and uncertainty calculation. A standard error of 100 is mentioned, but it is clarified that this represents a background level rather than an uncertainty. To accurately determine uncertainty, adjustments for background counts are necessary. The standard deviation for total-count measurements should be derived from a Poisson distribution. Finally, applying error propagation rules will yield the correct final result.
ChrisWM
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
We make two observations of the same star on different nights. In the first observation, the integrated flux value is 11,347 counts and in the second observation the integrated flux is 10,606 counts. Assume that the background level(dark & bias)is 100 counts for each observation. Also assume one count per photon(i.e. QE=100% and gain = 1).
a. Compute the difference in the star’s brightness and the uncertainty in that difference.
Relevant Equations
M=-2.5log(f1/f2) SE=𝜎/sqrt(2n-2)
I have found the difference in the magnitude from the counts to be -.073 using -2.5log(11347/10606) but I m unsure if this is right or how to calculate the uncertainty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the number 100 is a given standard error(uncertainty) for a single measurement. Perhaps you could use that to find the uncertainty for the difference.
 
guv said:
It looks like the number 100 is a given standard error(uncertainty) for a single measurement. Perhaps you could use that to find the uncertainty for the difference.
I think the '100' is the background level, not an uncertainty; it is basically the reading you'd still get with no star in view (e.g. like background level when measuring ionising radiation).

@ChrisWM first needs to correct the given total-count values to allow for this background.

It's not clear where 'SE=𝜎/sqrt(2n-2)' comes from. The standard deviation for each total-count measurement can be found by using the standard deviation for aPoisson distrubution.

Then the final answer can be found using the rules for error propagation.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
831
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K