Calculating Magnitude Difference: Is it Right?

AI Thread Summary
The calculated magnitude difference of -0.073 using the formula -2.5log(11347/10606) raises questions about its accuracy and uncertainty calculation. A standard error of 100 is mentioned, but it is clarified that this represents a background level rather than an uncertainty. To accurately determine uncertainty, adjustments for background counts are necessary. The standard deviation for total-count measurements should be derived from a Poisson distribution. Finally, applying error propagation rules will yield the correct final result.
ChrisWM
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
We make two observations of the same star on different nights. In the first observation, the integrated flux value is 11,347 counts and in the second observation the integrated flux is 10,606 counts. Assume that the background level(dark & bias)is 100 counts for each observation. Also assume one count per photon(i.e. QE=100% and gain = 1).
a. Compute the difference in the star’s brightness and the uncertainty in that difference.
Relevant Equations
M=-2.5log(f1/f2) SE=𝜎/sqrt(2n-2)
I have found the difference in the magnitude from the counts to be -.073 using -2.5log(11347/10606) but I m unsure if this is right or how to calculate the uncertainty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like the number 100 is a given standard error(uncertainty) for a single measurement. Perhaps you could use that to find the uncertainty for the difference.
 
guv said:
It looks like the number 100 is a given standard error(uncertainty) for a single measurement. Perhaps you could use that to find the uncertainty for the difference.
I think the '100' is the background level, not an uncertainty; it is basically the reading you'd still get with no star in view (e.g. like background level when measuring ionising radiation).

@ChrisWM first needs to correct the given total-count values to allow for this background.

It's not clear where 'SE=𝜎/sqrt(2n-2)' comes from. The standard deviation for each total-count measurement can be found by using the standard deviation for aPoisson distrubution.

Then the final answer can be found using the rules for error propagation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top