Calculating max weight object supports without counterweigh

  • Thread starter Thread starter James O'Neill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crane Max Weight
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
10 replies · 3K views
James O'Neill
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
In tower cranes counterweights are placed on the counter jib to prevent the crane from falling over. Whereas on mobile cranes the counterweights are placed directly behind the cabin.
The crane in itself also acts as some counterweight.
My question to you is:
How much weight can an object support on one side, without using counterweights, before falling over?
E.G. a 40 cm arm with an 8 Kg weight is added to a 20 Kg box. Will the box support the weight without tipping to the weighted side?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depends on the size of the box. You want to make a balance about the potential tipping axis.
On the left you have 20 kg x half the length of the box
On the right you have 8 kg x 0.4 m

Half the length applies if the box has uniform mass density (horizontal distance between center of mass and tipping axis -- the lower right)

Make a force diagram to see.
 
I have made a sketch as example.
123.png
 
I'm having some trouble seeing how you got 0.7 kg m at the end??
Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
 
James O'Neill said:
I'm having some trouble seeing how you got 0.7 kg m at the end??
Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
20 x 0.125 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is minus 0.7 kg m.

Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
Of course. If you lay the box on its side, you get 20 x 0.25 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is plus 1.8 kg m and the contraption will stay put.
 
BvU said:
20 x 0.125 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is minus 0.7 kg m
Ohhh... I thought since you said sum in your second message I had to add the two together.
BvU said:
If you lay the box on its side, you get 20 x 0.25 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is plus 1.8 kg m and the contraption will stay put
This makes sense.
If the 8kg weight was directly against the side of the box, it would also stay up, right? (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.125 kg m) = 1.5 kg m.
 
James O'Neill said:
Ohhh... I thought since you said sum in your second message I had to add the two together.
Yes, sum They are vectors and try to rotate in opposite directions, so one has a minus sign. Analogous to pulling to the left and pulling to the right.
If the 8kg weight was directly against the side of the box, it would also stay up, right? (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.125 kg m) = 1.5 kg m.
Nice try, but that case the 8 kg would try to rotate to the right with 8 kg times the horizontal distance of the center of mass of the 8 kg weight to the potential tipping point. Which is not the .125 m if it's an iron weight
 
So let's make the weight 10 cm long.
(20 x 0.05 kg m) - (8 x 0.05 kg m) = 0.6 kg m. Is it right this time?
Can you then adjust this formula to calculate counterweight needed?
 
So let's make the weight 10 cm long. (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.1 kg m) = 1.7 kg m. Is it right this time?
It would be (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.05 kg m)

See it as a see-saw or a weighing scale with uneven arms. As long as m1x1 - m2x2 > 0 it won't topple over point P
Topple1.jpg
 
Thank you for your help. I grasp it now.
(20 x 0.125 ) -(8 x 0.05) = 2.1 kg m. Won't topple over.