Calculating max weight object supports without counterweigh

  • Thread starter Thread starter James O'Neill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crane Max Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum weight an object can support without tipping over, particularly in the context of cranes. Participants explore the balance of forces and moments involved when weights are applied to one side of a box, considering various configurations and dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how much weight can be supported on one side of a box without counterweights, using a specific example of a box and an added weight.
  • Another participant suggests making a balance about the tipping axis and provides a formula involving the mass and distance from the tipping point.
  • There are discussions about the calculations of moments, with participants providing different interpretations of the results, such as 0.7 kg m and how to account for the dimensions of the box.
  • Some participants express confusion over the calculations and clarify the need to consider the direction of moments as vectors.
  • Participants explore how changing the position of the weight affects the balance, including scenarios where the weight is placed directly against the box or when the box is oriented differently.
  • There is an attempt to generalize the formula to calculate counterweights needed based on the moments calculated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and interpretations of the moments involved. There is no consensus on a single correct approach or formula, and confusion persists regarding the application of the concepts discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on assumptions about uniform mass distribution and the specific dimensions of the box and weights, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion also highlights the complexity of balancing forces in three-dimensional contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in mechanics, engineering principles related to balance and stability, or those studying the behavior of structures under load.

James O'Neill
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
In tower cranes counterweights are placed on the counter jib to prevent the crane from falling over. Whereas on mobile cranes the counterweights are placed directly behind the cabin.
The crane in itself also acts as some counterweight.
My question to you is:
How much weight can an object support on one side, without using counterweights, before falling over?
E.G. a 40 cm arm with an 8 Kg weight is added to a 20 Kg box. Will the box support the weight without tipping to the weighted side?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Depends on the size of the box. You want to make a balance about the potential tipping axis.
On the left you have 20 kg x half the length of the box
On the right you have 8 kg x 0.4 m

Half the length applies if the box has uniform mass density (horizontal distance between center of mass and tipping axis -- the lower right)

Make a force diagram to see.
 
I have made a sketch as example.
123.png
 
So on the lefet you have 20 x 0.125 kg m and on the right 8 x 0.4 kg m. Sum is 0.7 kg m to the right will keel it over !
 
I'm having some trouble seeing how you got 0.7 kg m at the end??
Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
 
James O'Neill said:
I'm having some trouble seeing how you got 0.7 kg m at the end??
Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
20 x 0.125 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is minus 0.7 kg m.

Also just curious, does three dimensional properties (l x h x w) have any effect on this?
Of course. If you lay the box on its side, you get 20 x 0.25 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is plus 1.8 kg m and the contraption will stay put.
 
BvU said:
20 x 0.125 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is minus 0.7 kg m
Ohhh... I thought since you said sum in your second message I had to add the two together.
BvU said:
If you lay the box on its side, you get 20 x 0.25 kg m minus 8 x 0.4 kg m is plus 1.8 kg m and the contraption will stay put
This makes sense.
If the 8kg weight was directly against the side of the box, it would also stay up, right? (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.125 kg m) = 1.5 kg m.
 
James O'Neill said:
Ohhh... I thought since you said sum in your second message I had to add the two together.
Yes, sum They are vectors and try to rotate in opposite directions, so one has a minus sign. Analogous to pulling to the left and pulling to the right.
If the 8kg weight was directly against the side of the box, it would also stay up, right? (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.125 kg m) = 1.5 kg m.
Nice try, but that case the 8 kg would try to rotate to the right with 8 kg times the horizontal distance of the center of mass of the 8 kg weight to the potential tipping point. Which is not the .125 m if it's an iron weight
 
So let's make the weight 10 cm long.
(20 x 0.05 kg m) - (8 x 0.05 kg m) = 0.6 kg m. Is it right this time?
Can you then adjust this formula to calculate counterweight needed?
 
  • #10
So let's make the weight 10 cm long. (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.1 kg m) = 1.7 kg m. Is it right this time?
It would be (20 x 0.125 kg m) - (8 x 0.05 kg m)

See it as a see-saw or a weighing scale with uneven arms. As long as m1x1 - m2x2 > 0 it won't topple over point P
Topple1.jpg
 
  • #11
Thank you for your help. I grasp it now.
(20 x 0.125 ) -(8 x 0.05) = 2.1 kg m. Won't topple over.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
19K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K