Calculating Moment of Inertia for Outstretched Arms: 1/3 vs 1/12 Formula

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for outstretched arms, specifically debating the appropriate formula to use: 1/3ML² versus 1/12ML². Participants are examining the implications of different pivot points and configurations of the arms in relation to the axis of rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differences between treating the arms as individual rods versus a combined model. Questions are raised about the significance of the axis of rotation and how it affects the moment of inertia calculations. There is also discussion on whether the combined moment of inertia can be calculated directly or if individual contributions must be considered.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the moment of inertia formulas. Some participants provide insights into how the axis of rotation influences the calculations, while others question the assumptions made in the models being used. No consensus has been reached, but several productive lines of reasoning have been presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the mass and length of the arms as a combined entity, which may affect the choice of formula. There is also mention of the parallel axis theorem in relation to more complex models of the arms.

Asad Raza
Messages
81
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Kindly see the screenshot attached below for the question.

Homework Equations


I=1/3ML^2
1/12ML^2

The Attempt at a Solution


In the solution to this question, the moment of inertia of the hands (when outstretched) is taken to be 1/12ML^2 (combined). I think that it should be 1/3ML^2 because the axis is near the shoulder. Also, wouldn't it make any difference if we are calculating the combined moment of the rods rather than calculating individually.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_89.jpg
    Screenshot_89.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 511
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what you take as M and L. If you consider it as two end-pivoted rods I is 2*1/3ML2. If you consider it as one centre-pivoted rod of mass 2M and length 2L, I = 1/12*2M*(2L)2 =2/3ML2. As you are given the mass and length of the two outstretched arms together, you should use I = 1/12ml2
 
Asad Raza said:
In the solution to this question, the moment of inertia of the hands (when outstretched) is taken to be 1/12ML^2 (combined). I think that it should be 1/3ML^2 because the axis is near the shoulder.
In their simplified model they are considering the "arm and hand" rod to be a single rod passing through the axis of rotation. The rotation axis is definitely not at the shoulder! It passes vertically though the center of the body.

upload_2017-12-8_11-26-1.png


Also, wouldn't it make any difference if we are calculating the combined moment of the rods rather than calculating individually.
Moments of inertia sum algebraically, so no, if the rod is continuous.

What would make a difference is if you were to form a more complex model where each arm+had is considered as separate rod attached at the shoulders. The axis of rotation would still be through the center of the body, so you'd have to apply the parallel axis theorem to calculate the moment of inertia of the rods about an axis that is offset from the end of the rod.

upload_2017-12-8_11-35-14.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-8_11-26-1.png
    upload_2017-12-8_11-26-1.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 875
  • upload_2017-12-8_11-35-14.png
    upload_2017-12-8_11-35-14.png
    12.2 KB · Views: 680
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Asad Raza said:
1/12ML^2 (combined). I think that it should be 1/3ML^2
It's the same thing. Each arm (measured from the spine) is length L/2, mass m/2. Applying the 1/3 formula for a rod about its end point that gives 1/3(m/2)(L/2)2 = mL2/24 for each arm, and a total of mL2/12.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K