Calculating motorcycle lean angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter motecben
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Motorcycle
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the lean angle of a racing motorcycle involves using data from three-axis G sensors and gyroscopes, while accounting for gyro drift and lateral G forces. The lean angle can be theoretically determined using the formula theta = arctan(a/g), where 'a' is lateral acceleration and 'g' is gravitational acceleration. Small accelerometers, like those from Crossbow, can be used to measure lateral G but may face mounting and vibration challenges. A correction for gravitational pull is necessary since the sensor is fixed to the bike and its orientation changes as the bike leans. Further discussions on sensor placement and filtering techniques could enhance accuracy in lean angle calculations.
motecben
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I would like to calculate racing motorcycle lean angle but my trig is very rusty. Data I can supply for the calculation includes 3 axis of G, 3 axis of gyro (rate of change). The gyro drifts with time as all gyros do. I also have 2 wheel speeds and GPS speed available. There are maths functions available for integration and differentiation among others.There would obviously have to be a correction put in for lateral G as the sensor is fixed on the bike.

A further interesting addition would be a compensation for the banking of a track surface. Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
motecben said:
I would like to calculate racing motorcycle lean angle but my trig is very rusty. Data I can supply for the calculation includes 3 axis of G, 3 axis of gyro (rate of change). The gyro drifts with time as all gyros do. I also have 2 wheel speeds and GPS speed available. There are maths functions available for integration and differentiation among others.There would obviously have to be a correction put in for lateral G as the sensor is fixed on the bike.
A further interesting addition would be a compensation for the banking of a track surface. Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated.

This is all back of the envelope, but it might be right:

Assuming a flat surface and no skidding, the lean angle of the motorcycle is related to it's speed and the cornering radius as follows:

theta = arctan ( V*V / r*g)

Where g is the gravitational constant.

Now, I think you can also show that the turning radius is related to speed and lateral acceleration as:

r = V*V / a

where a is the lateral acceleration.

Substitute r in the above and you get:

theta = arctan (a/g)

So to pull 1.0 g, then you need to be turning at a 45 degree lean angle. This is the theoretical limit assuming tires can't achieve coefficients of friction greater than 1.0.

So if you really have lateral acceleration, you don't really need anything else (I think) to get lean angle.

Where are you getting (or planning on getting) your lateral G's? Are there any small sensors out there suitable for motorcycles?

- Mark
 
Last edited:
Motorcycle lean angle

Hi Mark and thanks for responding. This was the first time I had used this forum and I posted the same question in 2 separate areas. Yours was the only reply after several weeks!

Yes we have small accelerometers that we can run on bikes from Crossbow in the US. They are very difficult to mount in such a way as to not get too much vibration interference but sometimes we get them to work OK. We can introduce filters that will assist somewhat. The problem that I am not sure whether you have addressed is that the lateral G sensor is fixed on the bike therefore the gravitational pull on the sensor changes direction as the bike leans so there has to be a correction put in somehow?

Thanks again for your thoughts. If you have any more, please continue to post them.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
20K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top