Calculating Power Needed for Torque & Revolutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter uselesspotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating power required for tightening screws using torque and revolutions. The key formula for instantaneous power is P = Tω, where T is torque and ω is angular velocity. For average power, the formula Pavg = (1/Δt) ∫θiθf T(θ) dθ is used, requiring torque as a function of angle. The conversation emphasizes that torque does not depend on the speed of rotation, but power does, and suggests numerical integration for datasets without a defined function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and angular velocity
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration
  • Knowledge of power calculations in physics
  • Ability to interpret data sets for numerical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and angular velocity in mechanical systems
  • Learn about numerical integration techniques for data analysis
  • Explore the concept of instantaneous vs. average power in physics
  • Investigate how to derive torque as a function of angle for varying conditions
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in torque and power calculations in mechanical systems will benefit from this discussion.

uselesspotus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lets say I am tightening a screw and I have multiple torque values with their respective number of revolution. How should I go on about calculating the power required?

Also let's assume we know the time it takes to tighten the screw.

2. The attempt at a solution
I know Power = T*dθ/dt = Tω = 2*pi*n*T, where T = torque, ω = angular velocity, n = number of revolution/sec
Since the torque is not constant I am not sure how to approach this problem. Is there any other information i need in order to calculate the power?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi uselesspotus, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Power is measure of the rate at which energy is being delivered (Watts, or Joules per second). So either you want the instantaneous power at some instant in time, or perhaps the average power delivered over the entire operation.

If the former, then you have your P = Tω formula. If it's the average power you want then if you have the torque as a function of θ, T(θ), you can integrate the torque over the angle and divide by the total time.
$$P_{avg} = \frac{1}{\Delta t} \int_{\theta_i}^{\theta_f} T(\theta) d \theta$$
 
gneill said:
Hi uselesspotus, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Power is measure of the rate at which energy is being delivered (Watts, or Joules per second). So either you want the instantaneous power at some instant in time, or perhaps the average power delivered over the entire operation.

If the former, then you have your P = Tω formula. If it's the average power you want then if you have the torque as a function of θ, T(θ), you can integrate the torque over the angle and divide by the total time.
$$P_{avg} = \frac{1}{\Delta t} \int_{\theta_i}^{\theta_f} T(\theta) d \theta$$

Thnx I get it now. Also does torque depend on how fast you rotate something? I would think it does not since it only depends on force. For example, using a hand instead of a machine.

This means work would just be Work = Tff (assume initial torque was zero in previous power calculation) since work is ∫Pdt
 
Last edited:
uselesspotus said:
Thnx I get it now. Also does torque depend on how fast you rotate something? I would think it does not since it only depends on force. For example, using a hand instead of a machine.
Just look at how torque is calculated. No mention of speed in there. What it is that applies the force is irrelevant too.
This means work would just be Work = Tff (assume initial torque was zero in previous power calculation) since work is ∫Pdt
Sure, if the torque has a constant value for all values of θ.
 
gneill said:
Sure, if the torque has a constant value for all values of θ.
How would the equation change if the torque wasn't constant? Wouldn't the work still be, after integrating, W = P*tf-P*ti And because the initial time = 0 W = P*tf where P is Pavg (the equation u provided in earlier post)...I believe I am thinking of this wrong way.

Going back to the Pavg equation, I would have to do numerical integration if I just have the data set not the function itself right?
 
Last edited:
uselesspotus said:
How would the equation change if the torque wasn't constant? Wouldn't the work still be, after integrating, W = P*tf-P*ti And because the initial time = 0 W = P*tf where P is Pavg (the equation u provided in earlier post)...I believe I am thinking of this wrong way.

Going back to the Pavg equation, I would have to do numerical integration if I just have the data set not the function itself right?

If you have a data set with constant torque values that cover a number of revolutions each then you can break the problem up accordingly; Presumably you'll have time intervals to correspond with torques and angular displacements. On the other hand, if you have torque as some function of the angle then you can integrate symbolically and plug in the limits.
 
I'd have to ask why you need to know the power "required"? In any case, as mentioned, torque does not depend on speed or velocity of any kind, power does. For example, if you are twisting at constant torque and varying speed then the power will vary linearly with the rotational velocity.
power = work X time; work = force X distance; power = force X distance / time, power = force X (distance / time), so power = force X velocity
 
Power = torque * angular velocity

If neither torque or angular velocity are constant you need to plot a graph of the product and find where it's a maximum. That will give you the max peak power.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
891
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K