Calculating Reflective coefficient for glass slab

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jlefevre76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient Glass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the reflective coefficient for a glass slab in the context of raytracing analysis for thin film solar cells. The user references "Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer" by Howell, Siegel, and Menguc, specifically Chapter 17, for the necessary equations. The reflective coefficient (R) is derived using the refracted angle (θglass) and surface reflectivity (ρ), with the final formula being R = ρ(1+(1-ρ)²/(1-ρ²)). The user expresses confusion regarding the assumption that reflectivity is the same on both sides of the glass slab due to differing indices of refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law for refraction
  • Familiarity with reflective and transmissive properties of materials
  • Knowledge of raytracing techniques in optical analysis
  • Basic principles of photovoltaic cells and their interaction with light
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Snell's Law and its applications in optics
  • Research the derivation of reflective coefficients for different materials
  • Explore advanced raytracing software tools for optical simulations
  • Investigate the impact of varying indices of refraction on light behavior in multilayer systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in optics, solar energy professionals, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of photovoltaic systems will benefit from this discussion.

jlefevre76
Messages
119
Reaction score
6
Okay, so now I've lost all confidence in myself. I've had a lot of issues calculating the reflective coefficient for a glass slab and a thin film solar cell. I know this method isn't perfect, and not as good as experimental data (which, if anyone here can supply, I'd be happy to take it). However, I need to get my raytracing analysis done, and hopefully get published again if possible. These calculations are critical to me getting a somewhat valid answer for my raytracing calculation. (FYI this is research, not homework)

So, I'm referring to "Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer" by Howell, Siegel, and Menguc. Chapter 17 details the equations. I'm assuming an unpolarized source (the sun), so 50% is polarized one way, and 50% the other (correct me if wrong, anybody).

So, this is how I THINK it's done:

Calculate the refracted angle (θglass):

nairsin(θincident) = nglasssin(θglass)

θglass = arcsin(nairsin(θincident)/nglass)

Then, the surface reflectivity is calculated:

ρ = (1/2)(tan2incidentglass)/tan2incidentglass)+sin2incidentglass)/sin2incidentglass))

Then, just to keep it simple this time, assume the transmissivity = 1 (I can also calculate this with an attenuation coefficient, but no need to include that part here):

τ = 1

So, the reflective coefficient for a glass slab would be:

R = ρ(1+((1-ρ)2τ2)/(1-(ρτ)2))

R = ρ(1+(1-ρ)2/(1-ρ2))

A similar equation comes up for the photovoltaic cells, and I think if I can get this one right, I can get the other one right.

Part of my confusion for how the equation for the reflective coefficient is derived stems from the fact that they assume the reflectivity (ρ) is the same on both sides of the slab. Would this be the case? Because, in my mind, as it enters the glass, it's going from a low index of refraction to a high one. Then, as it hits the other air/glass interface, it's going from a high index to a low one. Is ρ really the same for each side as the ray passes through the glass? I've attached a spreadsheet that should show the results.

Thanks in advance. Let me know of errors, etc. I'll try to correct them.
 

Attachments

Science news on Phys.org
Well, going to go ahead and bump my own post. If I have done something wrong so I'm not eliciting a response, please let me know (I'm new, after all). Also let me know if I didn't explain something very well.
 
So, no answer from the forums, I decided to take matters into my own hands.

My supplies:

A homemade UV LED flashlight, masking tape, a multimeter, alligator clips, a sheet of plexiglas, a CIS solar cell, and a tape measure.

Well, probably the first datapoint or two would have been enough, but I did a few, with honestly, really good results for a garage experiment (well, or basement bathroom).

There is some noise in the data, but it's good enough to give me confidence that I have correctly applied the theory.

Take a look. Hope this helps somebody some time.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
948
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K