Calculating regions of double integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonianAlch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a double integral by changing the order of integration. The original integral, ∫ from -1 to 1 of ∫ from x² to 2-x², led to confusion over the correct limits after switching the order. The new limits for y are established as 0 ≤ y ≤ 2, with x varying from √(-y + 2) to √y. Participants emphasize the importance of maintaining positive limits to avoid cancellation of areas, ultimately confirming the correct setup for the integral to yield the accurate area of 8/3. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in changing integration order and the necessity of careful limit selection.
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the follow by first changing the order of integration

\int_{x=-1}^{1}\int_{y=x^2}^{2-x^2}dydx

The Attempt at a Solution



This is the region we're concerned with:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot%28y%3Dx^2%2C+y+%3D+2+-+x^2%2C+x%3D+1%2C+x%3D+-1%29

The new inequalities would be:

0 ≤ y ≤ 2

\sqrt {-y+2} ≤ x ≤ √y

\int_{y=0}^{2}\int_{x=sqrt(-y + 2)}^{sqrt(y)}dxdy

Doing this double integral gives me a final answer of zero which I checked on MAPLE. The correct answer is 8/3

I'm guessing the bounds are incorrect, but I can't figure out why. On the plot y clearly has a lower limit of 0 and an upper limit of 2. The limits of x I just manipulated through the previous inequality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Calculate

\int_{y=x^2}^{2-x^2}dy

first. Then integrate in x.

Regards.
 
Yea, but I think they want me to do it the other way, it's a bit futile, since changing the order complicates things here, but I think it's just for practice to get an understanding of both ways.
 
Look at your integral again - particularly the y limits of integration. You cannot do a change of variables with just one integral in this case.
 
To change the order of integration, basically you need this integral:
\iint dxdy
Now, to find the limits of this new double integral, split the region vertically in half and describe each half to determine the limits:

For the upper quarter region:
For y fixed, x varies from x=\sqrt{2-y} to x=0
y varies from y=1 to y=2

For the lower quarter region:
For y fixed, x varies from x=\sqrt{y} to x=0
y varies from y= 0 to y=1

Hence the entire area of the region can be found by this double integral:
I=2 \left( \int^2_1 \int^0_{\sqrt{2-y}} dxdy + \int^1_0 \int^0_{\sqrt{y}} dxdy \right)=2\int^2_1 \int^0_{\sqrt{2-y}} dxdy + 2\int^1_0 \int^0_{\sqrt{y}} dxdy
 

Attachments

  • graph.gif
    graph.gif
    7 KB · Views: 542
Last edited:
That was very insightful thanks for that.

Although, for the lower quarter region do you mean y varies from y = 1 to y = 0?
 
NewtonianAlch said:
Although, for the lower quarter region do you mean y varies from y = 1 to y = 0?

You should always take the integral limits in the positive direction of the axes.

If you calculate from y=1 to y=0 and then add up, you will get zero as the sum of the area of the regions, since the area of the upper quarter region will cancel out with the (negative) area of the lower quarter region.
 
NewtonianAlch said:

Homework Statement


Evaluate the follow by first changing the order of integration

\int_{x=-1}^{1}\int_{y=x^2}^{2-x^2}dydx

The Attempt at a Solution



This is the region we're concerned with:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot%28y%3Dx^2%2C+y+%3D+2+-+x^2%2C+x%3D+1%2C+x%3D+-1%29

The new inequalities would be:

0 ≤ y ≤ 2

\sqrt {-y+2} ≤ x ≤ √y

\int_{y=0}^{2}\int_{x=sqrt(-y + 2)}^{sqrt(y)}dxdy

Doing this double integral gives me a final answer of zero which I checked on MAPLE. The correct answer is 8/3

I'm guessing the bounds are incorrect, but I can't figure out why. On the plot y clearly has a lower limit of 0 and an upper limit of 2. The limits of x I just manipulated through the previous inequality.
If you solve \displaystyle y=x^2 for x you get \displaystyle x=\pm\sqrt{y\ }\ .

If you solve \displaystyle y=2-x^2 for x you get \displaystyle x=\pm\sqrt{2-y\ }\ .
 
SammyS said:
If you solve \displaystyle y=x^2 for x you get \displaystyle x=\pm\sqrt{y\ }\ .

If you solve \displaystyle y=2-x^2 for x you get \displaystyle x=\pm\sqrt{2-y\ }\ .

Indeed, the integral could also be solved more directly, without splitting the upper and lower regions into quarters, but the limits can be a little confusing if you don't know which half of the curve corresponds to +ve square root and which half corresponds to the -ve square root.

For the upper half region:
For y fixed, x varies from x=√(2-y) to x=-√(2-y)
y varies from y=1 to y=2

For the lower half region:
For y fixed, x varies from x=-√y to x=√y
y varies from y=0 to y=1

Hence the entire area of the region can be found by this double integral:
I= \int^2_1 \int^{-\sqrt{2-y}}_{\sqrt{2-y}} dxdy + \int^1_0 \int^{\sqrt y}_{-\sqrt y} dxdy

Maybe someone can confirm this? I based the limits on the negative signs affecting the gradients of each half of the individual curves.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
sharks said:
...

Hence the entire area of the region can be found by this double integral:
I= \int^2_1 \int^{-\sqrt{2-y}}_{\sqrt{2-y}} dxdy + \int^1_0 \int^{\sqrt y}_{-\sqrt y} dxdy

Maybe someone can confirm this? I based the limits on the negative signs affecting the gradients of each half of the individual curves.
To find an area (which in this case should be positive), the order of the limits of integration should be from a lesser value to a greater value,
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
To find an area (which in this case should be positive), the order of the limits of integration should be from a lesser value to a greater value,

So, this is the correct integral for the total area:
I= \int^2_1 \int^{\sqrt{2-y}}_{-\sqrt{2-y}} dxdy + \int^1_0 \int^{\sqrt y}_{-\sqrt y} dxdy
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Yes, that is correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K