Calculating Rotational Kinetic Energy: A Merry Go Round Example

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a merry-go-round, modeled as a solid cylinder with a weight of 800N and a radius of 1.50m. A constant tangential force of 50.0N is applied to initiate motion. The correct approach involves using the moment of inertia formula (I = 1/2 * m * r^2) and the torque equation (torque = Force * radius) to find angular acceleration. The final kinetic energy is determined using the formula KE = 1/2 * I * (omega)^2, with the correct answer being 276J after correcting an initial miscalculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and moment of inertia (I = 1/2 * m * r^2)
  • Knowledge of torque and its calculation (torque = Force * radius)
  • Familiarity with angular kinematics, including angular acceleration and angular velocity
  • Ability to apply kinetic energy formulas for rotational motion (KE = 1/2 * I * (omega)^2)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about angular kinematics and the relationships between angular displacement, velocity, and acceleration
  • Explore the concept of torque in different physical systems and its implications on rotational motion
  • Practice solving problems involving rotational kinetic energy and angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators looking for practical examples to illustrate these concepts.

mizzy
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A horizontal 800N merry go round of radius 1.50m is started from rest by a constant horizontal force of 50.0N applied tangetially to the merry go round. Find the kinetic energy of the merry go round after 3.00s. (assume it is a solid cylinder).


Homework Equations


I = MR^2

KE (rotational) = I (omega)^2



The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is a straight forward question. I don't know where to start. I know there are a few unknowns: omega, angular acceleration, velocity.

can someone guide me please? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Use the torque to find the angular acceleration. Then use some kinematics. (That's just one way to go.)
 
Doc Al said:
Hint: Use the torque to find the angular acceleration. Then use some kinematics. (That's just one way to go.)

K. thanks. Here's what I did:

I found moment of inertia (I = mr^2). For m, i found that using the given weight, 800N.

I used the torque equation to find angular acceleration. (torque = I * angular acceleration) Where torque is equal to the Force * r. Once i got the angular acceleration, i solved for tangential acceleration (a = r * angular acceleration).

Then I found v using the equation, v = a*t.

Once I got v, i found angular velocity from the equation, v = r * omega.

THen finally I can solve for Kinetic energy! KE = 1/2 * I (omega)^2

my answer came up to 2.76 x 10^4J, but in the book it's 276J! :cry:
 
mizzy said:
K. thanks. Here's what I did:

I found moment of inertia (I = mr^2). For m, i found that using the given weight, 800N.
That should be: I = 1/2 mr^2.

I used the torque equation to find angular acceleration. (torque = I * angular acceleration) Where torque is equal to the Force * r. Once i got the angular acceleration, i solved for tangential acceleration (a = r * angular acceleration).

Then I found v using the equation, v = a*t.

Once I got v, i found angular velocity from the equation, v = r * omega.
That's OK, but there's no need to convert from angular quantities to linear then back to angular! The kinematic formulas work just fine for angular quantities:
Use ω = alpha*t instead of v = a*t.

(The fewer 'conversions' the fewer chances for arithmetic errors.)

THen finally I can solve for Kinetic energy! KE = 1/2 * I (omega)^2

my answer came up to 2.76 x 10^4J, but in the book it's 276J!
Give it one more shot.
 
k. I got the answer
 
ooops...i accidentally clicked on post reply.

In calculating the angular acceleration, i wrote down the wrong Force creating the torque. Instead of 50.0N, I used 500N! silly mistake!

Thanks Doc Al =D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K