Calculating Specimen Size Using Microscope Magnification | Homework Help

Click For Summary
To calculate the real size of a specimen observed under a microscope with 40X magnification and a field diameter of 1600 µm, the formula used is real size = image size / magnification. The image size of 1600 µm divided by the magnification of 40 yields a real size of 40 µm for the specimen. Since the specimen occupies one quarter of the field, its size is further reduced to 10 µm. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between magnification and actual size, encouraging users to conceptualize the problem through extreme analogies. Ultimately, the correct real size of the specimen is confirmed to be 10 µm.
lha08
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the field diameter on 40X is 1600 µm, and a specimen takes up one quarter of the field, how big is the specimen in real life?

Homework Equations


Magnification of image= Image size/ Real size of object

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure but in the formula, would be put the magnification of the image as 40 and image size as 1600 µm and solve? or would we simply find one quarter of 1600 µm and that would be the actual size of the specimen..? I'm a little confused so could help me clear things up about the differences between the two?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignore the quarter for now.

If the magnification is 40x and the image is 1600um then what is the real size of the object (hint the microscope makes things look BIGGER!)
 
mgb_phys said:
Ignore the quarter for now.

If the magnification is 40x and the image is 1600um then what is the real size of the object (hint the microscope makes things look BIGGER!)

Umm...I'm not really sure but all i can think of is that the magnification is 40 which is equal to 1600um divided by the real size of object and do i solve for the unknown?
 
Ignore the algebra an just think what's happening.

If the magnification was 2x then the object would appear twice as big as it really is.
If it appears 1600um then it must really be 1600/2 = 800um
 
mgb_phys said:
Ignore the algebra an just think what's happening.

If the magnification was 2x then the object would appear twice as big as it really is.
If it appears 1600um then it must really be 1600/2 = 800um

So in this case, the magnification is 40x so the object is 40 times bigger than the actual size, so 1600/40= 40 um?
 
lha08 said:
So in this case, the magnification is 40x so the object is 40 times bigger than the actual size, so 1600/40= 40 um?

Good, now if the specimen takes up a quarter of this space, how big is it?
 
Last edited:
BAnders1 said:
Good, now if the specimen takes up a quarter of this space, how big is it?
ahh oki so a quarter of 40 um is equal to 10 nm (that's the answer?)
 
lha08 said:
ahh oki so a quarter of 40 um is equal to 10 nm (that's the answer?)

If you have any doubt as to what the answer is, CONVINCE YOURSELF. What if you were a ridiculously tall Titan of 100ft whose naked eye could only focus on something as close as 4 inches away? Let's say some funny fellow Titan created a device (we'll call it a microscope) which could focus on things up to the unheard of size of ONE CENTIMETER (wow!). Now let's say you were a titan studying the complexities of a human pupil. If your Titan microscope could focus up 10X, and the pupil covered 1/4 of this size, how big would you say a human pupil was, after viewing it through the microscope?

What I'm trying to say is that we aren't allowed to tell you if your answer is correct or not, thus you must think of some extreme situation to test the answer yourself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K