Calculating Speed from a Falling Ball's Gravitational Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the height a 1.00 kg ball must fall to achieve a speed of 100 km/h, utilizing the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the energy conservation equation, questioning the relationship between gravitational energy and height. Some express confusion over unit conversions and the correct interpretation of energy versus height.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering numerical results and others questioning the validity of those results. There is a recognition of the need for unit consistency, particularly regarding the conversion of speed from km/h to m/s.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be confusion regarding the units of measurement, with participants discussing the transition from energy units (Joules) to height (meters) and the implications of using incorrect units in calculations.

Senjai
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How far would a 1.00 Kg ball have to fall freely to reach a speed of 100 Km/h ?

Homework Equations



\Delta E_g = \Delta E_k

The Attempt at a Solution



\Delta E_g = \Delta E_k

i then expanded to:

mgh' - mgh = \frac{1}{2}m(v')^2 - \frac{1}{2}mv^2

i got rid of the 1/2's and the mass

and 0'd out the equatiosthat would equal zero…

2gh' = -(v')^2
h' = \frac{-(v')^2}{2g}

subbed in the variables and ot 5.1 x 10^2 J.. which is wrong..

appreciate any help... thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you got height in terms of Joules?
 
the answer i got was 5.1 x 10^2 Joules, if that's what your asking...
 
Joules is the unit of work, not height (the answer you have to calculate in #1 is height). Even if you talking about the energy content of the ball, its not 5.1 x 10^2 J.
 
sorry i meant meters, I am actually not sure if its is meters... m/s / N/kg?

anyways, so let's go with meters. stil can't solve the answer..
 
:confused: still I don't understand why you are not getting the answer. You have the equation with you, just plugin the values in your last equation and get the answer (I got 39.4 m)
 
Last edited:
howd you get that? i still get 510...
 
using

h' = \frac{-(v')^2}{2g}
 
Check your units... you plugged in v as 100 kph and g as 9.8 m/s^{2}
 
  • #10
oh shii, unit conversion... sorry...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K