Calculating Spring Back Force for Flat Steel Sheet

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameervyas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the spring back force required to maintain a cylindrical shape for a 3.5mm thick steel sheet measuring 1200mm by 1800mm. Participants emphasize the complexity of this calculation due to the material's properties, specifically its plasticity and elasticity, particularly when exceeding the elastic limit. Empirical methods are suggested for determining the necessary force, as the spring back effect can vary significantly based on the initial bending and the material's characteristics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plasticity and elasticity in materials
  • Knowledge of spring back behavior in metal forming
  • Familiarity with empirical testing methods for material properties
  • Basic principles of bending and torsion in mechanical engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating spring back force in metal forming
  • Learn about the effects of material properties on bending and spring back
  • Investigate empirical testing techniques for determining force requirements
  • Explore machine capabilities for bending and holding cylindrical shapes in steel
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, metal fabricators, and anyone involved in the design and manufacturing of cylindrical metal components will benefit from this discussion.

sameervyas
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I want to know if there is any formula for calculating spring back force for flat sheet.

what i am trying to achieve:
I am trying to bend a 3.5mm thick 1200(w)x1800(L) mm sheet into a shape of hollow cylinder.
If one end of sheet is fixed i want to calculate how much force is required to hold/press the other end adjacent to fixed edge.
Neglect weight of strip

Material : steel 55mpa

thnx
Sameer
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That is rather complicated - when you bend a sheet into a circle and let go, it generally does not spring back to flat, but holds some of it's cylindrical shape depending on it's material properties. i.e. you'll exceed the elastic limit.

So you need to know about plasticity as well as elasticity for your sheet.

You'll also find it is easier to hold the inner edges together than to hold the two ends flat just by pulling on it.
 
Simon,
Thanks for reply mate,
With regard to my problem i just want to calculate how much force is required to keep sheet in cylindrical shape, not too much worried what profile it take once we remove the force.

Thanks
SAmeer
 
You misunderstand - it is difficult to calculate because you are exceeding the elastic limit, otherwise it is just an extreme torsion spring. The force is whatever it takes to close the last inch or so.

This is something you determine empirically - which means you won't know until you do it. I'd guess will be close to the spring back force of a small compression on a steel tube with the final dimensions so you want to bank on more than that.

But, if the initial bending put the ends slightly past each other, it would relax back to the shape you want but for 3.4mm mismatch (it's actually bent in a slight spiral) and that's just a small torsion-spring problem and you get a decent circular cross-section to the finished tube.

If the initial bending puts the ends smack-on, it'd relax back 2-5cm or so unless it's really good steel. Then, if you draw the edges close to weld them, you'll end up with a slight tear-drop cross-section.

Are you trying to figure if you have a machine capable of the force? Or if the weld (or whatever is to hold the ends together) will hold?
 
Hi Simon ,
Thanks again mate.
I do agree with all the comments made in previous reply. It is bit difficult to calculate, well i will continue on some way to figure out how can we calculate this.

We want to calculate for machine capablity. It a roller pussing against the tail end of coil to keep the last flap of the coil on the curvature of the coil.

Thanks Again
Sameer
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K