Calculating Spring Constant and Work Done on a Compressed Spring

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done on a compressed spring and determining the spring constant in a scenario involving a man stepping off a platform onto a spring. The problem is situated within the context of mechanics, specifically focusing on gravitational forces and spring dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations for work done by gravity and on the spring, questioning the validity of the original poster's approach and calculations. There is an exploration of the correct application of formulas related to gravitational work and spring potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the correct formulas to use, highlighting the differences between gravitational work and work done on a spring. There is an acknowledgment of the need for precision in calculations, particularly regarding the value of gravitational acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using accurate values and formulas, as well as the distinction between constant forces in gravitational scenarios versus variable forces in spring mechanics. The original poster's assumptions and methods are under scrutiny, leading to a reevaluation of their approach.

member 247426

Homework Statement


A man that has a mass of 100kg stands on a platform 10m high. Right next to the platform is a spring of the same height. When the man steps off the platform and steps onto the spring, the spring compresses to 3m in height. What is the work done on the spring? What is the spring constant?


Homework Equations


w=(1/2)Fd
F=ma
w=(1/2)kD2


The Attempt at a Solution


w=(1/2)(100kgx10m/s/s)(10m-3m)=3500J


3500J=(1/2)k(7m)2
k=142.9 N/m


Am I using the correct equations and if so, am I getting the right answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

You seem to have used a valid approach to solve the problem, but the equation for work done by gravity on the man is not quite right and, not knowing what precision is required, I would probably expect a more precise value of g to be used.
 
Filip Larsen said:
Welcome to PF!

You seem to have used a valid approach to solve the problem, but the equation for work done by gravity on the man is not quite right and, not knowing what precision is required, I would probably expect a more precise value of g to be used.

Using 9.8 m/s2:
w=(1/2)(F)(d)
w=(1/2)(100kg x 9.8 m/s2)(10m-3m)
w=3430J

I'm using w=(1/2)Fd because it is derived from w=(1/2)kd2 since k*d = F.

3430J=(1/2)k(7)2
k=140 N/m
 
danvalen1 said:
Using 9.8 m/s2:
w=(1/2)(F)(d)

As Filip Larsen points out, you are not using the correct formula for the work done by gravity.

I'm using w=(1/2)Fd because it is derived from w=(1/2)kd2 since k*d = F.

The formula for the force on a spring,

F = kd

is correct.

The formula for the potential energy of a spring, or work done on a spring,

W = \frac{1}{2}kd^2

is also correct. Let me show you where this comes from. By the definition of,

W = \int \vec F \cdot d \vec s

we have as applied to a spring (using the variable x instead of d, for the compression distance),

W = \int _0 ^x \vec F(x') \cdot d \vec x'

= \int _0 ^x kx dx,

Thus

W = \frac{1}{2} k x^2.

Or if you use d for the compression distance,

W = \frac{1}{2} k d^2.

But,

W \ne \frac{1}{2}Fd.

It doesn't "work" that way.

For gravity, assuming a constant acceleration, thus constant force over h,

W = \int \vec F \cdot d \vec s

becomes,

W = \int _0 ^h \vec F \cdot d \vec z

= \int _0 ^h mg dz.

But here (unlike the spring case), m and g (and F, for that matter) are constant over z, and can be pulled out from under the integral.

W = mg \int _0 ^h dz

Which becomes,

W = mgh

Or if you'd rather,

W = F _g h

where Fg is the force due to gravity (assuming constant acceleration).

The major difference between gravity and a spring, is that in the case of gravity, the force is constant. In the case of a spring, the force is proportional to the amount of compression. So they each have correspondingly different equations for their work functions (or potential energy functions, if you interpret it that way).
 
Now I get why I can't use that. Thank you very much!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K