Calculating Swing Angle for Equal Kinetic Energy: Man vs Car

  • Thread starter Thread starter omc1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Swing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the angle from the vertical at which a man must begin to swing in order to achieve the same kinetic energy as a car moving at a specified speed. The context includes concepts of kinetic and potential energy, as well as the geometry of a swing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in the context of a swing. There are attempts to derive the angle using the height from which the man must drop, with some questioning the calculations and assumptions regarding the geometry of the swing.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on visualizing the problem through diagrams. Some have expressed confusion regarding the calculations and relationships between the components of the swing, while others have clarified the geometric relationships involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings about the setup of the problem, particularly regarding the definitions of height and the components of the triangle formed by the swing. There is an emphasis on ensuring the correct interpretation of the energy relationships and the geometry involved.

omc1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

The rope of a swing is 2.9 m long. Calculate the angle from the vertical at which a 77-kg man must begin to swing in order to have the same kinetic energy at the bottom as a 1430-kg car moving at 1.13 m/s (2.53 mi/hr).

Homework Equations


ke=1/2 m v^2 w=f Δx cosθ



The Attempt at a Solution

i found the ke of the car to be 912.98 J and now iam trying to relate that to the man to find theta but am finding it hard to
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With a swing, potential energy is converted to kinetic energy. You want to match the KE of the car to the KE of the man. The man's KE can be related to his PE.
 
so ke(912.98)=mgh where h=Lcos(theta) ??
 
Setting KE equal to PE is correct. That provides you with the height the man must drop on the swing. But you have an error in your angle calculation.
 
iam not sure where i went wrong on that?
 
If you draw a picture of the swing at some angle from the vertical you will see where h is in relation to the triangle formed by the vertical, the rope position, and the horizontal line going from the vertical to the man's position. It should then be obvious what you should do to calculate theta.
 
if h is the vertical line and L is the hypotenuse then doesn't that mean thath h=Lcos(theta) i know its wrong and this should be really easy but i don't understand y its not working...
 
h is the distance the man must drop so that his KE equals the KE of the car. h is the vertical line below the triangle where you are to compute the angle. To compute theta, you need the triangle leg which is vertical and lies on the vertical radius.
 
The KE match is at to bottom of the arc of the swing.
 
  • #10
ok sorry iam just really confused...so in the triangle h is the bottum and is the length that theman is swining...L is the vertical component or the hypotenuse??
 
  • #11
No. Draw the picture so that the swing is off from the vertical by about 50 degrees - right of vertical. Draw a horizontal line from the swing to the vertical. The h you have computed is the distance from where that line intersects the vertical radius and the bottom of the arc.

The hypotenuse of the triangle is the radius, 2.9 m. The horizontal leg of it is unknown and is the line you drew from the swing to the vertical radius. The vertical leg of the triangle is the difference between the radius and h.
 
  • #12
ok i think i understand that so the vertical commonent is r-h? so that mean h= r-rcos(theta)??
 
  • #13
That's it. You've got it. Bye...
 
  • #14
ok thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K